Many people ask what is a white-collar crime. Well in sociology its definition is any crime committed by respectable and high-status people. These crimes are basically committed in the course of one occupation. Crimes, which are considered "white-collar", include embezzling, price-fixing, insider buying, fraud, falsification of expense accounts, and theft of materials. These crimes are extremely harmful to society. So if these crimes are so dangerous why are these perpetrators treated more leniently than other criminals. There are many theories behind the dramatic difference in how society responds to "white-collar crimes" and "regular" crimes. These theories range from money, the type of perpetrator, and most of all how the court of law looks at the criminal when the sentencing process takes place.
             When one thinks of white-collar crimes, money is the first thing that comes to mind. In fact, money is actually one of the reasons that white-collar criminals are treated more leniently. I say this because usually upper-class criminals have money and can afford the best legal advice. They also have more stable employment records, are better educated, and have important property. This is quite different compared to the common criminal, with several crimes under his or her belt. White-collar criminals are even said to suffer more than common criminals from simply undergoing prosecution. On the hand, the common criminals are more likely to lose jobs or to suffer a loss in social standing. The white-collar criminals can just pay their way back into society like nothing even happen.
             The next situation that is put into mind is the type of perpetrators commits these crimes. For some white-collar crime is not viewed as a "crime" at all, because of its non-violent nature. Violent crimes has an immediate and observable impact on its victim which raises rage of the public
             ...