Should We Sustain From War with Iraq
Asking the question, "Should we sustain from war with Iraq," in my opinion, is kind of like asking, "Is it safe to give a monkey a hand-gun." Obviously, the answer is no. Obviously, I believe in comic relief. Being serious though, which this topic definateley is, Saddam Hussein is a dangerous man. He's a threat to other nation's as well as his own. He refuses to left UN Inspectors enter his restricted areas. Doing this, he is directly violating the Gulf War Treaty. It's also proven that he possess chemical and biological weapons. Removing Hussein and his regime would also help the war on terrorism since it is proven that he funds such groups. War is the only option for the United States, and it's an option that will be very cheap and relatively painless.Generally, Hussein is a proven threat to international security; he is interested in developing chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons and has shown a willingness to use such weapons on Iraq's neighbors but also against Iraq's Kurdish population. Iraq has to be removed as a threat now before it has the ability to lash out at Israel, Saudi Arabia, Ku
Experts say that in less than three years Saddam will have nuclear weapons. A change in regime would eliminate a state sponsor of terrorism, and would help eliminate terrorism worldwide. In reality, toppling Hussein will have little or no negative impacts the region at all. UN inspectors were unable to certify that Iraq had disarmed its WMD programs due to Iraqi obstructions. There's no telling in which way this would happen, but it's worth a try with the current relationship with the two groups in my mind. Iraq, exclusively Hussein, has a track record of supporting terrorism throughout the Middle East. If Iraq were to acquire Weapons of Mass Destruction it could threaten regional stability and deter any potential military action against Iraq. It's also proven that he possess chemical and biological weapons. Most importantly, removing Hussein would be consistent with the goals of the war on terrorism. Back in the day, when the US spent money on WWII, the US's economy was positively affected. Doing this, he is directly violating the Gulf War Treaty. Winning the war would be easy and the costs would be minimal. Also, considering the issue that this war is over, I think it's imperative that we fight against terrorism. Since the inspectors left Iraq in 1998, Hussein has had considerable time to rebuild his WMD program and to improve his ability to hide critical facilities. The Iraqi military was devastated during the Guld War and has continued to suffer after 11 years of sanctions and other military actions.
Common topics in this essay:
Storm WMD,
Middle East,
Removing Hussein,
Guld War,
WWII US's,
,
UN Inspectors,
Treaty It's,
Mass Destruction,
Saddam Hussein,
chemical biological,
un inspectors,
removing hussein,
war terrorism,
biological weapons,
chemical biological weapons,
nuclear weapons,
violating gulf war,
war treaty,
gulf war,
treaty it's,
violating gulf,
war treaty it's,
gulf war treaty,
treaty it's proven,
|
Acceptance Essays
