12 Angry Men
12 Angry Men Group Case, Groups & Teams Section In the film, 12 Angry Men, the jurors or the group demonstrated unmistakably how teams effectively interact, or work together to perform a common task. As the group developed through the film, they clearly exhibit the stages of group development. The trial exemplifies the pre-stage and then jury deliberation. When the first vote was called for, the group came to an eleven to one vote this was the forming stage. Henry Fonda does not truly believe the defendant to be innocent, however, he correctly remarks that the case for the defense may be more believable. The rest of the jury believes that the boy is guilty. From this difference in opinion, reasons for both possibilities are discussed. This discussion is the storming stage where ideas and inputs are questioned in no particular order or organized manner. Fonda would like to simply be absolutely certain that the boy is not guilty before they make a final decision. During the norming stage, Fonda becomes the leader. One by one, he convinces the rest of the jurors that there is reasonab
The last few to raise their hands raised them because discomfort is generated from being different from the group. There was another vote called later in the film that was a secret ballot, and there was one man who changed his vote in favor of not guilty. The team has civilized disagreements but listen to one another. The men did a standard raise of hands to count voted. The group then adjourns, with a common feeling that there is not enough evidence to convict the defendant. There are several conformity issues present in the film. He was consistently polite and reasonable. Cobb, and the Garage Owner were clearly deviants for the bulk of the movie, until they cracked at the very end. le reason to vote not guilty, making them join him as leaders themselves. About eight men (it may have been more, but it was a clear majority of the twelve) instantly raised their hand in favor of guilty. In the fourth stage, the group performs, each jury member's finds that there is perhaps enough reasonable doubt not to convict the defendant after all. They were constantly insisting on keeping the jury's vote at guilty. Using yelling and screaming made this phenomenon very clear; Cobb contradicted himself when he mentioned, "What does he know? He's just an old man??" This implies that the jury cannot believe any of the old man's testimony, which was most of Cobb's argument.
Common topics in this essay:
Henry Fonda,
Teams Section,
Garage Owner,
Screaming What's,
raise hands,
rest jury,
favor guilty,
12 angry,
,
changed vote,
vote guilty,
boy guilty,
conformity issues,
convict defendant,
vote called,
|
Acceptance Essays
