12 Angry Men
In the movie 12 Angry Men, there were two different types of leaders among the jury. The first was the designated leader, the foreman. He was already appointed to be the spokesman of the group when we are first introduced to the cast of the movie. We can see from the beginning that he uses a democratic style of leadership more than any other style. He always wants to know if his fellow jurors agree with the proposed method of vote when a vote occurs. He seems to listen more to the other jurors than to provide and comments or opinion. From the beginning you can see that the foreman sits back and does not interact much with the somewhat uncontrollable group. Had I been the foreman I woul
Smaller supportive sub-groups formed within the larger 12 man jury, and changed constantly. d have put more effort into getting some say about why they were voting guilty, and not jump into the voting of a verdict. He doesn't lose his temper like some of the other jurors. He used a laissez-faire style of leadership in that he only brought about inconsistent points about the trial yet he did not try to direct the individual jurors towards the not guilty verdict. There also seems to be a few emerged leaders throughout the movie. The group as a whole was not supportive. He seems to have a personal reason for seeing the boy sentenced to death. I do not support non-unanimous verdicts because it is just like majority rules in the sense that, yes, the majority of the jury believes one verdict and thinks move quickly, but however, those who are the minority become frustrated and the group becomes separated. The most important emergent leader was the eighth juror. Consensus takes and builds all members' opinions and values into the decision, and for the jurors this is hard to accomplish. Some members of the jury knew that a decision was needed and they based their decisions on what the other jurors supported. The one important leadership quality is his ability to stay calm and focused. Members of these groups supported each. All members of the jury needed to have the same decision about the case.
Common topics in this essay:
,
vote guilty,
jury decision,
style leadership,
technique jury,
|
Acceptance Essays
