Abortion
In Roman times, abortion and the destruction of unwanted children was permissible, but as out civilization has aged, it seems that such acts were no longer acceptable by rational human beings, so that in 1948, Canada along with most other nations in the world signed a declaration of the United Nations promising every human being the right to life. The World Medical Association meeting in Geneve at the same time, stated that the utmost respect for human life was to be from the moment of conception. This declaration was re-affirmed when the World Medical Association met in Oslo in 1970. Should we go backwards in our concern for the life of an individual human being? The unborn human is still a human life and not all the wishful thinking of those advocating repeal of abortion laws, can alter this. Those of us who would seek to protect the human who is still to small to cry aloud for it's own protection, have been accused of having a 19th Century approach to life in the last third of the 20th Century. But who in reality is using arguments of a bygone Century? It is an incontrovertible fact of biological science - Make no Mistake - that from the moment of conception, a new human life has been created. Only those who allow their emotion
There are still people who would rather try it themselves or go somewhere they will be completely anonymous. How real is that risk - it is not - in fact, the suicide rate among pregnant women be they happy of unhappy about the pregnancy, is 1/4 of the rate among non-pregnant women in child-bearing years. Before exploring the reality of so-called safe abortion, let me tell you a little method of procuring an abortion. On the other hand, we have all seen women what have been troubled, consumed with guilt and development significant psychiatric problems following and because of abortion. Edwin Connow, "Should she have the right for what is really judicial execution of new life - not a cat, not a chicken but a human being - not only potential but actual". And in conclusion, I would like to read to you a letter which a member of Birthright received. We'll tell Jenny that her 1st mommy thinks of her often and wonders how she is. Abortion by suction curettage is not just as simple as a pelvic examination performed in a doctor's office as Dr. al passion to overide their knowledge, can deny it: only those who are irrational or ignorant of science, doubt that when a human sperm fertilizes a human ovum a new human being is created. (2) Most women who are mentally healthy before unwanted pregnancy, despite a temporary emotional upset during the early weeks for the pregnancy, are mentally healthy after the pregnancy whether they were aborted or carried through to term. If we kill infants with confidential defects before they are born, why not after birth, why not any human being we declare defective? It is no surprise of course for many of us to learn that in hospitals across North American Continent such decisions affecting the newborn and the very elderly or those with incurable disease, are being made. That is why some are less disturbed by the slaughter of thousands of unborn children than by the personal problems of a pregnant women across the street. This evidence might exist if suicides were common among people with congenital handicaps. Then how can they think it right to kill an unwanted fetus, even more defenceless than a newborn babe just because it may grow into an unwanted child.
Common topics in this essay:
Association President,
Medical Association,
According Wyn,
Edwin Connow,
Dr Guttmacher,
Dear Birthright,
United Kingdom,
Britain Abortion,
Attorney's Office,
Organization Serious,
human life,
abortion laws,
unborn child,
medical association,
unwanted child,
life death,
unwanted children,
weeks pregnancy,
1st mommy,
moment conception,
baby boy girl,
life death unborn,
world medical association,
repeal abortion laws,
death unborn child,
|
Acceptance Essays
