Affirmative aAction

Affirmative action is a growing argument among our society. It is multifaceted and often defined vaguely. “Some can define it as the ability to strive for equality and diversity, while others might see it as a quota-based system for different minority groups. Is it a helping hand to equalize opportunity or is it reverse discrimination?” (Education Central).

When affirmative action was first presented to the Supreme Court, it was introduced in the case of The University of California v. Blakke (1978). “In this case, the medical school of

. . .
This will give the initiative to individuals of all different races, to raise their standards and work harder to achieve any goals in life that they may set for themselves. We as a society are not getting anywhere. We will never reach the goal of an equitable society based on merit if we discriminate in any way. “The university’s officials say that it is no accident that racial and ethnic minorities account for more than 25 percent of its 36,000 students, a statistic that makes this the most diverse of any large institution of higher learning in the Midwest.

Opponents of affirmative action argue the fact of how we can have a country that says that discrimination is wrong and yet have all these exceptions. This will ultimately end with there being more people with strong opinions against equal opportunities for minorities and more people with prejudice thoughts.

Of course, it is not fair for an individual to be penalized because of his or her race, and on the same line, it is not fair for a particular race to be preferred because of past discrimination, but affirmative action does not assume this as some critics may think. Universities have a responsibility to choose students who will “contribute to the institution’s educational, academic and social goals” and if they feel that having a more diverse student body will help provide a better education than no ones rights are violated. These are the type of people who would prove beneficial to a college and who would in reality make a discussion more profitable. When a white man was denied admission, however, having better grades and test scores than the minorities, the case was brought to the Supreme Court, where they decided that racial quotas were illegal but that race could be considered as one of the factors in the admissions decision as long as schools sought to obtain a diverse student body” (Street Law). T’s or worked their whole life to achieve straight A’s. With whites beginning to be discriminated against due to affirmative action, whites will once again receive advantages to make up for it. Even the many clubs that are evidence of diversity are also evidence of certain separateness: there are Hispanic groups, Asian groups, groups that are predominantly white. Each entering class reserved 16 of 100 places for minority groups. the University of California had decided that the best way to increase minority enrollment was to give certain advantages to minority applicants.

Common topics in this essay:
Supreme Court, Hispanic Asian, Affirmative Action**, Cose Opponents, Education Central, affirmative action, University California, African- American, Street Law, University Michigan, California Blakke, equitable society, past discrimination, diverse student body, diverse student, idea affirmative, supreme court, student body, gender discrimination, goal equitable, idea affirmative action, goal equitable society, racial gender discrimination, action programs, past racial gender,

Approximate Word count = 1956
Approximate Pages = 8 (250 words per page double spaced)

Already a member? Click here