Affirmative Action: Poor Policy, Poor Results

Affirmative action is a policy in the United States with its primary purpose to increase opportunities for minorities and women. Affirmative action policy seeks to increase opportunities by favoring minorities and women in the hiring process, promotions, college admissions, and the awarding of government contracts (“Affirmative Action” n. p.). As originally conceived, affirmative action attempted to eliminate discrimination and provide a source of opportunity for those less fortunate. In reality, affirmative action did not eliminate discrimination at all; discrimination was merely reversed. The policy is not only a form of reverse discrimination, and unconstitutional, but it has completely failed to reach its intended goals as well. Many American citizens believe that the abolition, or at least the restructure of affirmative action would be beneficial to the American people.

The fact that the implementation of the affirmative action policy in the United States has resulted in reverse discrimination is clearly evident. First, the affirmative action program contradicts the very principles that the Constitution proclaims to be true. The fundamentals of the Constitution are based upon

. . .
White males do not receive the preferential treatment that minorities receive.

On March 6, 1961, President John F. Statements made by President John F.

Proponents of the affirmative action policy fail to recognize the great injustices that occur in direct correlation to the policy. Martin Luther King was one of, if not the greatest advocates of equal rights in American history. The minorities and women who are supposed to be “gaining” from this program are the two groups that are being hurt the worst. Thomas Kane from Harvard University best summed up what the affirmative action process has done when he stated, “Racial body count has become more important than actually educating people for success” (qtd. The affirmative action program had placed students with the potential to be very successful at other institutions into an environment where they were incapable of succeeding. The problem at Berkeley was that these students were capable of being successful at different universities, but not qualified enough to be successful at Berkeley. The abolition of the affirmative action program is our only choice.

An example of the ill conceived effects of the affirmative action program developed at The University of California at Berkeley. Kennedy, and the writers of the Constitution.

Common topics in this essay:
Affirmative Action, Berkeley University, Dr Kings, President Kennedy, Constitution Supporting, Dr Kane, Constitution United, affirmative action, Berkeley Throughout, Harvard University, Opportunity Employment, action policy, affirmative action policy, black students, action program, affirmative action program, minorities women, white males, government induced, martin luther king, martin luther, president kennedy, luther king, dr martin luther, president john kennedy,

Approximate Word count = 1593
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page double spaced)

Already a member? Click here