Animal Research
RESOLVED: THAT THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD STOP ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION SEEING AS HOW ANIMAL TESTING IS INHUMANE AND IMMORAL.INTRODUCTION: Animal Cruelty One of the touchiest aspects of our relationship with animals is the use of animals in laboratory sciences. Some manufactures of cosmetics and household products still conduct painful and useless tests on live animals, even though no law requires them not to. Some people, called anti-vivisectionists, are at one extreme in their concern. They want an abolition of all experiments on live animals. At the other extreme there are those who say that it is quite all right for us to do whatever we like to animals. They say that God gave us such a right, since it is written in the bible (Genesis 1:26) that man has dominion over all creatures. If these tests give some educational value, or adds to scientific knowledge, or can help improve human health, they argue that it is worth killing animals or subjecting them to painful experiments. I believe that the unnecessary testing of animals is inhumane and unethical when alternative methods are available. So t!he government should stop animal testing.
Manufactures argue that they conduct the Draize test to protect the public from unsafe products. The experimenters said that the injuries produced in their own experiment were "Typical of those described for the dog". Clearly, animal testing is almost a thing of the past. LOS ANGELES: UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS, 1986 (PAGE 81): At the Lovelace Foundation, Albuquerque, New Mexico, experimenters forced sixty-four beagles to inhale radioactive Strontium 90 as part of a larger "Fission Product Inhalation Program" which began in 1961 and has been paid for by the US Atomic Energy Commission. Animal Testing has been around for a long time and many cruel tests have been performed on these innocent animals. Non-oral methods of administering the test include injection, forced inhalation, or application to animals skin. Albrecht 9 This test measures the degree of impairment, yielding an index of irritancy. ABOLITION: To completely do away with. Many companies are working in fierce competition and dozens of alternative are being developed. Most commonly, animals are force-feed substances (which may be toothpaste, shaving cream, drain cleaner, pesticides, or anything else they want to test) through a stomach tube and observed for two weeks or until death. Women's products torture the white rabbits and also for other tests. Rabbit eyes differ significantly from human eyes: rabbits possess a nictitating membrane (a third eyelid) and have a slower blink reflex, a less effective tearing mechanism and a thinner cornea than humans.
Common topics in this essay:
Drug Administration,
Designs Technical,
MACMILLION INC,
Gil Langley,
Animal Cruelty,
Public Supporters,
Agarose Diffusion-Tiny,
Lethal Dose,
SOURCE Animal,
PRENTICE-HALL INTERNATIONAL,
animal testing,
animal experimentation,
strontium 90,
draize test,
neutral red,
fifty percent,
source page,
animal tests,
eye irritancy,
human cells,
cosmetics household products,
animal testing inhumane,
injected strontium 90,
fifty percent animals,
government stop animal,
|
Acceptance Essays
