Ashland Oil
In January 1988, a 4-million gallon oil storage tank owned by Ashland Oil Company, Inc., split apart and collapsed at an Ashland oil storage facility located in Floreffe, Pennsylvania, near the Monongahela River. The tank split while being filled to capacity for the first time after it had been dismantled and moved from an Ohio location and reassembled at the Floreffe facility. The split released diesel oil over the tank's containment dikes, across a parking lot on an adjacent property, and into an uncapped storm drain that emptied directly into the river. Within minutes the oil slick moved miles down river, washing over two dam locks and dispersing throughout the width and depth of the river. The oil was carried by the Monongahela River into the Ohio River, temporarily contaminating drinking water sources for an estimated 1 million people in Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and Ohio, contaminating river ecosystems, killing thousands of wildlife, damaging private property, and adversely affecting businesses in the area.Round-the-clock clean-up efforts were undertaken by Ashland and its contractors, under the supervision of governmental coordinators located at the terminal in Floreffe. After local authorities executed the initial on-
Finally, this incident shows the lack of policies and involvement by government agencies. Whatever long-term ramifications resulting from the spill surface in time AOI is responsible and liable for them. Contractors employed by Ashland performed the actual cleanup duties. Reconstruction of the tank failed to conform to industry standards or the terms of the contract for the project. The failure by Ashland to find the flaw and establish relevant material properties are the two most serious excursions from sound practice and code compliance by the company. These were all bad decisions that ring of cost cutting shortcuts and laziness. The Agency also performed follow-up activities such as compliance inspections and a spill prevention control and countermeasures plan inspection. This crisis highlights the company's lack of internal conduct and safety operating procedures for checks and balances of its industries. Ashland, its employees, and some contractors displayed a pervasive pattern of negligence and ignorance in selecting, assigning, constructing, supervising, and inspecting the reconstruction project. scene response during the night, EPA took control of the cleanup operations. At this point, the CEO was not prepared to unleash the skeletons resulting from press release A. 's response to the incident was adequate but slow. Neither press releases are bad each with it merits and negative repercussions, but press release publicly admits wrongdoing opening the issues for further scrutiny with potential legal and criminal repercussions. Press release A forgoes the attorney-client privilege and brings right to the forefront the issues and facts concerning the spill. Aside from the legal, the ethical liabilities remain as long as cause and effect relationships exist between the spill, environment, and the community.
Common topics in this essay:
Oil Inc,
Practices Act,
PRESS RELEASE,
Virginia Contractors,
Oil Inc's,
ETHICAL ANALYSIS,
Monongahela River,
Virginia Ohio,
Exchange Commission,
Team RRT,
press release,
ashland oil,
diesel fuel,
spill environment community,
days incident,
environment community,
water supplies,
monongahela river,
operating procedures,
water sources,
ashland oil inc,
press release press,
west virginia,
|
Acceptance Essays
