Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes
Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes The topic that I chose to do research on was Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes. The two articles I found were related in a sense because they both are in the same field which is interpersonal emotions. One article dealt with the interpersonal effects of emotions in negotiations, where as the other article dealt with gender differences; and why women like women more than men like men. The investigators were interested in finding the interpersonal effects of anger and happiness in negotiations. In the other article, the investigators were interested in finding out why women like women more than men like men. The investigators from article one predicted a three-way interaction between the opponent's emotion, the participant's need for closure, and negotiation round, where as only participants with a low need for closure would make lower demands to a frustrated or angry opponent than to a happy opponent: This effect would become stronger after each consecutive round. Also, the interpersonal effects of anger and happiness on the participant's concessions in the course of the negotiation would be moderated by time pressure. Lastly, this moderating effe
Also, pro-female bias to the extent that participants automatically favored their mothers over their fathers or associated male gender with violence, suggesting that maternal bonding and male intimidation influence gender attitudes. MethodThe investigators carried out their studies in these articles by participants being escorted to a private cubicle where they completed the tests given; gender attitude, self-esteem, and gender identity IATs in that order. These experiments made a big contribution to the science of health psychology due in part to seeing how self-esteem works well or poor in negotiation situations, and how well genders work together and who prefers who. These investigators expected their hypotheses to follow through and be correct, and answer all the prior questions they had at the beginning of the experiments (Journal of personality and social psychology, 494-528). Results The investigators in these studies found that in the gender differences article women scored higher than men on the gender attitude IAT. Both articles had something to do with preference in a certain situation. Women showed more in-group bias than men showed dramatically. ) Also, the other investigator used the method of anger vs. Lastly, sexually experienced men encountered the more positive their attitude was towards sex; the more they completely favored women. I thought it was interesting how the groups were tested in three different areas and forms of testing, and how the surveys and charts showed who works better with who and who prefers who. These investigators were trying to answer the question whether other sources of implicit attitudes, including cognitive balance and emotional conditioning, might override cultural status when predicting automatic gender attitudes. Their research methods were carrying out IATs which attributed many categories such as: (woman, lady, girl, gal, man, sir, boy, guy. The independent variables were the number of participants in the experiments. Women showed a perfectly balanced gender identity where as men showed no evidence of a balanced gender identity. It was worthwhile because I learned a lot from these studies.
Common topics in this essay:
Van Kleef's,
Relations Processes,
gender identity,
information processing,
Processes Introduction,
gender article,
gender differences,
interpersonal effects,
interpersonal effects anger,
effects anger happiness,
women scored,
effects anger,
balanced gender,
women scored gender,
scored gender,
women women,
Interpersonal Relations,
degree information processing,
evidence mediating role,
|
Acceptance Essays
