Quality
Research
Material!

CSAP and Educational Accountability

Coming up next spring is the fourth annual Colorado Student Assessment Program (commonly referred to as CSAP) exams, which test students on standards-based criteria in math, science, reading and writing. Highly publicized and widely debated, the CSAP has not exactly been taking the back seat to other educational issues. In fact, it is has been and still remains the educational issue in the state, dividing teachers, administrators, state legislators and even the governor as to what function the CSAP should serve in public schools. It started as rallying cry from Gov. Bill Owens—his answer to the critics who said not enough was being done to adequately reform education within the state. For the past ten years, the country has been undergoing a radical change in education reform. Standards have been implemented in every public school system to make sure students are learning and performing at the levels expected of them and their respective grade levels. Owens saw this as not being enough, so he implemented the CSAP along with its penalties for under-performing schools, and rewards for high-achieving ones. To explain these penalties and rewards, the assessment system must be touched on first.

. . .

According to Meaghan O’Brien, a fourth grade teacher at Cheltenham Elementary in Denver, students who are taught to the test will be lacking other skills they need to succeed in an educational setting, one being to think on their own. Teachers who teach to the test focus primarily on the content of the exam their students are taking, thus leaving out important information in certain areas of academia. I can’t wait for my first meeting with the football coach and the band director” (19). This shows the growing anxiety of teachers about student performance on standardized tests, and trying to help the students lead academically healthy and balanced lives. This type of rating system only aids in skewing the public perception of schools based on the CSAP exam. The state legislature produces these test preparation guides, only to administer a test that does not reflect the practice teachers have their students go through, but this is not the only way students are being set up for failure. Another reason teaching to the test is hurting education is because it is teaching students in a rote and robotic manner, and students can learn to depend on this kind of instruction. However, behind this increase in performance lies a brutal reality that many teachers are agreeing with: The CSAP sets up students for failure on the annual exam. Teachers have too many students, too many demands on their time and too few hours to focus on first-rate standards. Again, pressures to have students perform well on the CSAP can be overwhelming at times, forcing a teacher to contract their curriculum to fit in more instruction time for the subjects the students will be tested over. When different schools’ demographics are accounted for or when the amount of non English-speaking students are counted in a school in a school, it can be better realized that this may not be the answer to our educational reform questions. Teaching to the test may be helping some students succeed on the CSAP, but it will hurt students in the end. However, teaching to the test has another effect because it takes away from a teacher’s creativity, a source that can be critical to students’ learning. As Jones puts it, “Schools…will begin early, end late, have no electives, and give gifted students no lunch.

Approximate Word count = 3659
Approximate Pages = 15 (250 words per page double spaced)

Simply subscribe to view this paper, and 100,000 others.

CREDIT CARD
ONLINE CHECK
JOIN BY PHONE
Members get exclusive access to over 100,000 essays.
Don't pay per page, get instant access to the whole database.

Essay's Topics

All research is for reference purposes only.

Copyright (c) 2001-2008 Mega Essays LLC, All rights reserved. DMCA