Language causes segreration

Initially, language acted as a cementing force. The English language was selected as the international language primarily to unite people from various countries for political, economic, social and commercial purposes. In today’s world, we can see that other languages such as; French, Spanish, Mandarin or even Portuguese are widely accepted as universal languages.

However, I strongly believe that language causes segregation instead of unity. The example given above where few languages were used as medium of communications obviously demonstrates the presence of segregation amongst the people. Besides, the existence of code switching in the English language or even in my native language (Malay) gives a clearer picture that language sets people apart. Code switching makes one adapt his vocabulary, grammar and pronunciation in order to suit the needs of the interlocutor. For example, the way one speaks English to his peers, teachers, and taxi drivers are very much dissimilar. One tends to speak in an informal manner with his peers, very polite with his teachers and perhaps blunt to a taxi driver.

This shows that people are not united; instead they seem to fall into certain social categories identified by the

. . .

View the whole essay, without interruption

At times when I am startled or surprised, unfortunately, I tend to indulge in vulgar vocabularies. However, someone who speaks to the authorities will tend to be soft spoken, respectful and polite. Not to mention, literary jargon and science jargon, which have hundreds or maybe thousands of words that are difficult to understand except by those adept at the discipline. For example, a master speaks to maids in a very rough voice, disrespectful manner and sometimes-even worse when a master does not even use words but just snaps the fingers to command attention. Prescriptions certified by doctors can only be understood by the pharmacists due to the medical jargon.

Communication is not only through words, whereas more than fifty percent of the usage is dependent on the tone of voice as well as body language.

In addition, the existence of jargon; words or terminology that are difficult to understand exacerbate the situation.

In conclusion, I strongly feel that language is a more divisive rather than a unifying factor because differences persist not only between people speaking their own language, but also within a language because of code switching and other factors. This slang is called ‘Manglish (Malaysian English)’ which are opposed by many literates and educators. For example, there is computer jargon. Malaysians are very much likely to say ‘lah’ in the end of every sentence. The fact that it is open to interpretation, that one can make it ones own and yet in the end they will reach an understanding. Code switching can also be found in my native language, Malay. Besides, my facial expression will change every time I see her and I will definitely trill my voice whenever I am asking for a favor.

As a matter of fact, I find that my own personal language very unique and distinctive.

Approximate Word count = 913
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)

Simply subscribe to view this paper, and 100,000 others.