| |
|
| |

Each one of us has the choice of what we think is moral and there is not a certain set of laws which we base decisions on but our own personal reasoning given we have thought of how it will be conceived publicly and there for by God. They are like legislators in that they act morally so that others will be accountable and respectful and likewise act morally. If something doesn't depend on will but only its existence in nature, and its only worth is to gain some further good is called a "thing. The Categorical Imperative is a device that guides the thought process of a person acting morally. Kant therefore rejects all other attempts at finding other moralities, including those based on utility, or happiness. " However, something that is rational because there are ends in themselves and not used only as means are called "persons. In conclusion, in order to determine whether a certain act is morally good or bad we must, and do, apply Kant's Categorical Imperative. Instead, Kant sees morality as coming from an unconditioned moral law. Kant explains this with what is known as the Categorical Imperative. In this reasoning it is not looking at what can take place from the action but what the certain action is. To Kant, virtue lies in the good will of us rather than any certain end to be achieved, while good will is shown in the performance of an action for the sake of carrying out a duty rather than for some other end. It is also our duty to treat others and not simply as means and therefor we have the right to expect this same treatment from them as well. A maxim is something that is accepted on its own merits and relates to moral law in that one makes choices according to God as right or wrong. These so-called laws are not only the duty of the "legislators" but of everyone. So if we are considering a choice to be publicly accepted we are really considering whether it would be considered right or wrong by God since that is how the public would accept it as right or wrong. Some topics in this essay:
Categorical Imperative,
According Kant,
Immanuel Kant,
Instead Kant,
Kant Kant,
categorical imperative,
moral law,
act morally,
act duty,
considering choice,
free choice,
according kant,
choice publicly,
acting morally,
|
|
| |
 |
 |
| |
|
Approximate Word count = 867
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced) |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Want to view this paper along with 100,000+ other example essays, term papers, and book reports?
Register Now and see what you've been missing!
INSTANT ACCESS single user memberships can be purchased online with a Credit Card, Online Check , or by
1-900 Number. |
|
| |
| |
Membership Plans |
Credit Card |
Check |
Phone |
Savings |
30 Day membership (recurring billing) |
$19.95 |
$24.95 |
|
|
30 Day membership (non-recurring billing) |
|
|
$34.95 |
|
90 Day membership (recurring billing) |
$39.95 |
$49.95 |
|
32% |
180 Day membership (non-recurring billing) |
$59.95 |
$74.95 |
|
50% |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|