Gender and the Decision to Run f
The article Entering the Arena explores the relationships of women entering the political arena of electoral office. Richard Fox and Jennifer Lawless explore why women choose to run for elective office and why there are more men in these elective offices than women. The authors argue that there are not enough surveys taken to fully understand why women choose to enter the electoral arena. Political scientists seem to focus on three phenomena that have come from surveys from past years. The incumbency advantage, candidate recruitment and the professions of the candidate play a role in why women do not run for electoral offices. " Yet none of these explanations for women's under-representation considers the decision-making process by which women or men become candidates for public office" (Entering 2). If the proper research is implemented in the next few years, I believe we will find the answers to these questions. The authors argue the experimental research on the initial decision to seek elective office is scarce and the experimental research on how people choose to run for office is difficult to implement. Their hypotheses are to study gender differences in political ambition through a survey of eligible women and
Women are very concerned with their credibility and look to their professional credentials for reassurance that they have much to offer the citizens of America. The survey also reviewed that women are more likely to run on a Democratic ticket. One of the results from this sampling method showed that women seemed to be on an average three years younger than the men because these women just recently entered into the fields of law and business (EtA 23). Richard Fox and Jennifer Lawless used the Citizen Political Ambition Study, a national survey of possible men and women in the "eligible pool for elective office", to explain why this under-representation of women exists (EtA 6). These potential candidates were matched by their area of residency, region, education level, household income, and by race. "Regardless of the fact that women are just as likely as men to win elections, we wind up with twice as many men holding elected offices "(EtA 8). This allowed them to seek potential candidates for lower level offices as well as high-level offices. Additionally, this allowed them to tap into people who are slated to run, and to also pursue candidates who are not considering running in the near future but would consider running later in life. The final results concurred that women's under-representation is prevalent in today's society. Their sampling method involved sending out a four-page mail survey to 3,400 men and 3,400 women where each one was considered to be part of the "eligibility pool. The political issues that especially concern women and children are the platform for their ideology. Our philosophies are changing and will change as time reveals the issues before us. Tables1-5 and Appendix B are the last pages of this report. I was thinking they were well represented in political offices.
Common topics in this essay:
Ambition Study,
Jennifer Lawless,
United Congress,
Entering Arena,
Jennifer Lawless',
Ruth Ginsburg,
eligibility pool,
Washington DC,
Fox Jennifer,
Tables1-5 Appendix,
richard fox jennifer,
law business,
political ambition,
richard fox,
fox jennifer,
Richard Fox,
run office,
jennifer lawless,
women choose,
choose run,
elective office,
fox jennifer lawless,
choose run office,
women choose run,
political activists political,
|
Acceptance Essays
