Why we need music censorship in America
Two teenagers get up one morning. Both live normal lives and have never harmed a fly. However, years of listening to heavy metal, gothic, and rap music have put destructive suggestions into their subconsciences. They decide that their lives are not as perfect as they want them to be. They arrive at school with guns in hand, and start shooting at several of their peers and teachers. Some of the students and staff lay dead, others injured, and the rest emotionally instable all because of the music that provoked those kids that morning. Children should be protected and hindered from this weapon that has been fired on society. Some politicians believe that censoring or filtering out vulgar language and inappropriate themes will infringe on the artist's right to freedom of expression. United States government should have right to censor all music for the sake of our teenagers who are yet to become the future leaders of America. I will have to admit that some teenagers will still have access to whatever they want to listen to. And that some artists will be promoting what they have been doing underground if censorship becomes legal nationally. As you probably know, the Washington, D.C.-based American Psychological Association (APA) r
" However, it is impossible for parents to be fully aware of all the lyrics their kid hears, especially with the poor labeling system used today. " The government has a moral legitimacy in censoring. Some will also say that, "these musicians who promotes violence, sex, and racism are in fact providing a positive role model for young people. Even children under ten can access music from siblings that have "filthy lyrics" (Hughes 1) and begin mimicking what they hear without knowing better. This way parents will be more prone to buy music from artists, and the record industry will not suffer from the lost sales when stores refuse to sell albums marked with a parental advisory sticker. Also, parents will be satisfied that what their kids are listening is safe for them to listen. Therefore, censoring these kinds of much that promote immorality by teens will greatly decrease. Many foreign racists seek a sanctuary in the United States in order to record their music (Obejas 2). People correctly look to the government as the public arbiter of common morals, for the wider social good. It should be the parents' responsibility to oversee this. 1st Amendment clearly promises one's freedom of speech. They are self-made success stories. Even the humorous violent songs increased aggressive thoughts," the study said. To avoid the issue of moral decay in the world, music labels could encourage all artists both new and old to write songs with positive themes. That is why we need censorship, to let artists express themselves freely, but for public use (radio, TV, concerts, and etc), artists could make edited versions more available to people who don't want to listen to the vulgar language and sexuality.
Common topics in this essay:
Social Psychology,
Zappa Rock,
,
Finn Donovan,
CD Obejas,
Pro Censorship,
Association APA,
Nirvana Horny,
vulgar language,
Butler Finn,
violent songs increased,
future leaders america,
immoral themes,
censor music,
date rape,
music censorship,
violence racism,
butler finn donovan,
kinds music,
sex violence,
future leaders,
leaders america,
|
Acceptance Essays
