Opposing View Points On The Rehabilitation of Sex Offenders
Can Sex Offenders Responsible for Child Abuse be Rehabilitated?The first writer, Eric Lotke, claims that they can be. He says that not every offender fits the criteria for a drooling violent predator who rapes women and children for pleasure. Most people believe that the only way to deal with these offenders would be to castrate or electrocute them because nothing else will stop them from committing the crime again in the future. Apparently, however, this stereotype is not always true because a lot of times, sex offenders are used as "bogeymen" by politicians to intimidate and scare citizens concerned about public safety. Another important point is that the idea of what is sexual abuse has changed greatly over the last few decades. What is considered sexual abuse now might not have been thirty years ago. Only 1% of the arrests made on sex offenders involve the offender actually engaging in sexual intercourse. Eric says that statistically, after being caught sex offenders usually will not reoffend. Also, receiving treatment can help to decrease the chance of a sex offender reoffend
Geller, is convinced that they can't be. A lot of times, sex offenders are people who were once being sexually abused in their life and this can somewhat explain why they act the way they do, even though it does not excuse their actions. She argues the belief that molesters can be cured only leads to more rapes and murders of innocent children by repeat sex offenders. I do feel that she was using a bit of exaggeration with her information because not every person reacts in the same way to a stimulus. Also, fewer than 1 in 20 offenders arrested for sex crimes against children spend any actual hard time in prison. It is always hard to tell if someone has learned from their mistakes or not so therefore, this is a very complicated issue to deal with. The offenders who are incarcerated and then released, there is a 75% certainty that they will commit new offenses and those who receive treatment for the crime are even more likely to reoffend after they are released. On the other hand, I do agree that the courts should keep a much closer eye on these people than they currently are. This statement somewhat contradicts the statistics in Eric Lotke's report but it does explain why the average victim number for these child molesters is twenty-three children. Geller's report, it is very hard to understand why these child molesters can be considered harmless after they are imprisoned for their injustices. If this is true, than it might be a good idea to keep a much closer eye on those offenders. She asks the question, "How many more times will we turn a blind eye to the startling recidivism rate for child molesters before we say no more?" She wonders how long it will take for judges to realize that there is no cure for what therapists call "inappropriate sexual urges". There is actually a much greater chance that a person who has recovered from a drug addiction will begin to do drugs again or a person who has taken counseling for their violent acts will be violent again. In Eric Lotke's report, he says that only 1% of the offenders actually rape or hurt their victims.
Common topics in this essay:
Shari Geller,
Eric Lotke,
Shari Geller's,
Eric Lotke's,
sex offenders,
Abuse Rehabilitated,
sexual abuse,
child molesters,
Child Abuse,
Sex Offenders,
Offenders Responsible,
Responsible Child,
abuse rehabilitated writer,
times sex offenders,
repeat sex,
lotke's report,
eric lotke's,
closer eye,
offenders responsible child,
sex offender,
child abuse rehabilitated,
times sex,
responsible child abuse,
abuse rehabilitated,
|
Acceptance Essays
