Leadership
Leadership is the process of influencing people so that they will perform a variety of tasks efficiently and effectively. It is therefore, crucial to have a strong leader who can inspire and motivate but at the same time command respect from those getting lead. A leader is different to a manager as a manger is often appointed to a position of power; whereas a leader may emerge as the best to cope in given situation (i.e. somebody may be viewed by others as a leader although that person may be at the lower end of the organisational hierarchy).There are 4 main styles of leadership autocratic, democratic, laissez faire and paternalistic:Autocratic is often referred to as an authoritarian leadership style and it means that the people at the top of organisation make all the decisions and delegate very little responsibility down to their subordinates. Communication is top-down, with no opportunity for feedback to the leader. It can cause much resentment and frustration amongst the workforce.Democratic involves the managers and leaders taking into account the views of the workforce before implementing any new ideas new ides/systems. This can lead to increased levels of morale and motivation amongst the workforce.
The group normally breaks up and members prepare to disengage from the group. At this stage the group focuses collectively on accomplishing the task. The third stage of development is the norming stage. It is at this stage that group starts to develop group norms and attempts to build a sense of group cohesion. The leader is likely to consult the workforce before implementing any decision, but he/she is unlikely to listen to much of the feedback. The forming stage involves the formation of a group of people that are to work towards a common task. It is important for the group to find some common ground and resolve the conflicts at this stage, as the group needs to cooperate. The main factors affecting leadership styles are risk factors, type of business, necessity for change, nature of task and organisational culture. The same could also be said for "Fernando Morientes" who in some aspects is a leader as he has a wealth of knowledge and experience that texts books just can't provide and the younger strikers in Liverpool team look up to him for advice and will learn and improve by just working with him, another was "bill shankly" who could motivate and put the belief into his teams that they were invincible and that all other teams in the world would have to give in and submit. This method of leadership can result in high levels of enthusiasm for the task in-hand, but it can at times rely on too much on the skills of the workforce. Group norms and cohesiveness will determine whether the group develops a positive or negative synergy. Without him it's a totally different team with no desire, drive, passion and all the other things that team feeds off by just having him there. Unresolved conflicts can lead to an impact in the effectiveness and efficiency of the group. The desire for some form of celebration will depend upon the cohesion of the group, the time spent together, and the complexity of the task. The norming stage is crucial for the group to unite and attempt to build upon the areas that the group has in common.
Common topics in this essay:
Fernando Morientes,
LEADERSHIP Leadership,
Gerrard Liverpool,
stage development,
stage stage,
storming stage,
development process,
forming stage,
stage development process,
try gain,
five stages,
liverpool team,
norming stage,
amongst workforce,
|
Acceptance Essays
