Affirmative Action
"As early as 1871, Frederick Douglas ridiculed the idea of racial quotas, arguing that they would promote an 'image of blacks as privileged wards of the state'" (O'Conner, pp. 216). Affirmative action is viewed either as reverse discrimination or compensation for past mistakes. It allows under qualified minorities to take the place of more deserving majorities. Affirmative action has been thought of as the only way to ensure a diverse student body when in reality all it is doing is lowering the intelligence level of universities and companies by allowing people who are not capable to contribute.In the case of Gratz vs. Bollinger the Supreme Court ruled that such and act was unconstitutional. Petitioners Gratz and Hamacher, both of whom are Michigan residents and Caucasian, applied for admission to the University of Michigan's (University) College of Literature, Science, and the Arts (LSA) in 1995 and 1997, respectively. Although the LSA considered Gratz to be well qualified and Hamacher to be within the qualified range, both were denied early admission and were ultimately denied admission" (Gratz, pp.1). The University's Office of Undergraduate Admissions (OUA) "considers a number of factors in making admissions decisions
The University will admit all qualified applicants from African American, Hispanic, and Native American backgrounds giving them 20 of the 100 points needed for admissions. "One of the ideal facts of life is that on ideal, racially blind admissions program based on predictions of academic success would virtually exclude black and Mexican American applicants from the best American professional schools" (Green, Jr. Just as was stated in the beginning of this essay, Frederick Douglas argued that "racial quotas. Trying to create diversity by making race a factor in acceptance is bigotry in itself and is there for prohibited by the Equal Protection Clause and should not be accepted. promote 'an image of blacks as privileged wards of the state'" (O'Conner, pp. Race should not be a factor because it is a form of discrimination. "The University's considerations of race in its undergraduate admissions decisions violates section 1 of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, Title VI, and 42 U. "Most Americans also agree that the ideal of quality demands that men and women be judged on individual performance. Admission to a university should be based on test scores, grades, and extracurricular activities. Petitioners filed this class action stating that the University's use of racial preferences violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteen Amendment.
Common topics in this essay:
Law School,
Frederick Douglas,
Jr Robert,
Title VI,
Fourteen Amendment,
Justice Rehnquist,
African American,
Protection Clause,
Native American,
Tanges Andy,
affirmative action,
law school,
equal protection clause,
protection clause,
equal protection,
african american,
vs bollinger,
admission university,
supreme court,
undergraduate admissions,
student body,
green jr robert,
clause fourteen amendment,
jr robert pp313,
test scores grades,
|
Acceptance Essays
