A comparison of manned missions to space and robot missions

In space, there are lots of unpredicted variables and things that we do not expect to occur. Due to this, it is important to have manned space missions. Humans are capable of solving problems, whereas robots only know what they’ve been programmed to do. Apollo thirteen would have been destroyed if it were

. . .

On the other hand, manned missions are much more expensive than robots. A single flight of the space shuttle costs around $420 million dollars. The Mars Pathfinder cost only $265 million and it brought back lots of useful scientific data. In addition, manned shuttles need places to stay. ” This makes robots better candidates for space exploration than astronauts. When it comes down to the question of who should explore space, it is clear that both robots and humans are needed. Robots and humans can supplement each other.

Furthermore, manned space missions have greater risk than robot missions. a robot, but since it had a human crew on board, it survived. When a robot is destroyed, a new one can be made and any problems with the old version can be fixed. This is a large con to sending robots into space. As in the case of Apollo 1 and Apollo 13, accidents occurred on manned space missions.

Common topics in this essay:
Mars Pathfinder, Soviets Sputnik, Space Station, space missions, manned space, manned space missions, hand manned, missions risk, robot missions, missions costly, hand manned missions, manned missions, robots humans, space robots,

Approximate Word count = 429
Approximate Pages = 2 (250 words per page double spaced)

Already a member? Click here