Carnige
Wealth can be measured in many instances; material values or moral and character ethics for example. In society today, the amounts of money, the quantity of property or the worth of possessions dictate the level of status or way of life. These resources acquired through personal success are controlled by the successor. In Carnegie's time of 1889 wealth was measured to the equivalent of today but on a more superior scale. He argues that the unequal distribution of wealth needs to be resolved. The idea of distributing wealth evenly a
Combining class structure through equal wealth distribution is a disaster for individualism. Individualism, distinctiveness and uniqueness are also lost and irreplaceable traits that result with the distribution of wealth. The three natural rights are guaranteed to all citizens, rich or poor. Both classes were given the ability to succeed in the areas of wealth, and to strip the accomplished of their wealth only to distribute it to others is a lengthened process called robbery. This idea would cover the debt of failures and defect the profits of accomplished. If the wealth structure were evened out, both classes would be tossed into a melting pot where working laboring people would be pitted against the average loaf or lethargic man. The idea of dissembling the wealth acquired by the rich and distributing it to the "less fortunate" contradicts this phrase. Tearing and destroying a prosperous person's wealth to justify the poor man's failure to succeed disproves the American dream of opportunity. This is another ethical contradiction of the American way where individuality is a lead trait. Carnegie's plan for distribution of wealth does not justify the destruction of the rich class or their achievements. Along with that disproportionate proposal rises a problem with the ethical standing of individualism, distinctiveness and uniqueness. mongst the rich and the poor is inequitable to the wealthy. All motivation to rise above the competitor would be destroyed through distribution. Turning back one's ability to distinguish him compared to his challenger or neighbor allows conformity to ascend.
Common topics in this essay:
,
distribution wealth,
individualism distinctiveness uniqueness,
wealth measured,
rich poor,
wealth justify,
individualism distinctiveness,
distinctiveness uniqueness,
|
Acceptance Essays
