Amusing Ourselves to Death
My Reaction Amusing Ourselves to Death, by Neil Postman informs us on the evolution of communication. Neil's views are expressed clearly in the text through his opinions and views. I believe that you distinguish his standpoints strong passionate that he writes on his ideas. Along with his passion I sense his attitude, by coming forth in the beginning of the paperback and saying, "..as plainly as I can, this book is an inquiry into and a lamentation about the most significant American culture fact of the second half of the twentieth century: the decline of the Age of Typography and the ascendancy of the Age of Television"(p.8). I deem that this statement shows his straight views, how he says things the way that he really believes, and this is the case through the book. He takes us through the evolution of communication by talking of its birth in the New England Region of the United States and its growth from there. He discusses the meaning of epistemology and how it pertains to his written text, and his broad thoughts. From the epistemology, he moves on to the written word and how it developed in many diverse directions. At the birth of our nation there were no; emails, telephones, or printed material floating around. With these co
With this it took a long time for people to be informed on what was going on in the country. People heard everything by what was passed on from the person next to them. Following these great advancements is the most evolutional communicational device, the television. nveniences not in our reach the only tool for communication was found in between our chins and noses: our mouths. This invention allowed people to do three things at once: listen, hear, and watch the occurrences day to day. Not knowing what the computer will take us, maybe intimidating to such a strong nation. The paper could not move too much faster than the word because it only traveled as fast as the train or horse could go. So, when there was breaking news about in the country how reliable and accurate do you think that it was? How different do you think that news was from when it started eventually until it ended? For instance with the tragedy on September 11, how long do you think that it would have taken for us Kansans to hear of this? How far from the truth do you think that this news would have been? After the truth passes trough a couple hundred thousand people, I think that it would have more than likely been very distorted and vague. I find his way of writing excellent with his beautiful words of satire on the front cover to his blunt and stern views to the least page. Although it made our nation smarter, it left us unintelligent. Could you believe this distortion today? The great innovation of the time was the printing press, which for the nation gave a clearer truth to matters and events. I enjoyed reading Postman's views on the nation and it communication. Using our mouths as the only implement for communication made things difficult. I believe that his writing hold much truth and relevance to the state and future of out strongly amused country.
Common topics in this essay:
Region United,
Age Business,
Media Epistemology,
Neil Postman,
Age Televisionp8,
Age Exposition,
Age Typography,
evolution communication,
allowed people,
changed communication,
|
Acceptance Essays
