Jimmy Wylie
             Nurture plays a much larger role in the development of aggression in one's personality then that of nature. Green (http://mentalhelp.net/psyhelp/chap7/) defines aggression in terms of four basic elements: 1) delivery of a harmful stimulus or stimuli (i.e. an insult, kick, ect.) to another person, 2) an intent to harm another person, 3) a belief that an action will be effective, and 4) a target who is motivated to avoid being harmed. Human aggression seems to universally effects humans as a species. However there are some societies, like that of the United States who are much more affected by both internal and international aggression. Psychology Today (http://mentalhelp.net/psyhelp/chap7/) asked, "If you could secretly push a button and thereby eliminate any persons with no repercussions to yourself, would you press that button?" 69% of American males and 56% of American females said they would. There are many theories which argue that aggression is a natural aspect but there is just too much evidence that argues aggression as being a product of socialization. Most of the arguments siding that aggression is a natural behaviour are just theories and ideas with little or no fact in them. These arguments tend to blame aggression on insanity and mental illnesses. On the other hand, these theorists state that acts of aggression are done from observing others and seeing their successes and the benefits aggression brings. This is easily shown though family life
             and is extremely evident in the media. Some others argue that aggression can be a way of trying to gain attention.
             At a very young age influences with aggression can deeply affect the way one's personality develops. As stated earlier the theories arguing that aggression is a natural part of a human's personality use mental dysfunctions in an attempt to prove this. For example; Charles Whitman killed his wife and...