Gender
· Why can it be argued that "gender" is not a noun (Judith Butler 1999:3 )? "Gender is always a doing, though not a doing by a subject who might be said to preexist the deed... There is no gender identity behind the expressions of gender; that identity is performatively constituted by the very "expressions" that are said to be its results."(1999:25) This prominent argument presents Butler's assumption: gender is not a noun, in her acclaimed book Gender Trouble. Gender Trouble became Butlerīs masterpiece regarding to the understanding of the real meaning of gender. Her outstanding career has given her the ability to get us involve in diverse topics related to gender. It may sound foolish, but rational speaking, as we all know, a noun is a word used to name a person, animal, place, thing, or an abstract idea, nevertheless, by analysing the meaning of gender, we find out that is not classified in any of these categories, what take us to consider Butlerīs statement. Normally we would refer to gender as sex, still gender denotes cultural behaviour attributes assigned to females and males, creating a cultural essence of what is feminine or masculine. Leading us to Butlerīs argument: "It would make no sense
What Foucault is trying to say, his main argument concerning all the above it's synthesis on the fact that prohibition brings into being that which it prohibits. These two authors are influenced by the work of Nietzsche who argues that in his day and age the belief in God is dispensable. Being a linguistic theorist / philosopher he mentions that there are statements that do not 'describe' or 'report' anything and are neither 'true nor false'. Regarding if we are allowed or not of choosing our own gender, traditional Marxists had argued that individuals were the authors of their own destinies, Althusser argues that this is not the case, rather individuals are the expression of the historically determined structures in which they are embedded. Based on this, Butler define gender as performative, ". There is an identity that is given to us within the society based on our biological sex, which indicates the role that we must represent in life. To begin with the basics of performance, we'll go through Austin's work. In A Derrida reader : behind the blinds (ed) Peggy Kamuf pp 82-111. By infelicity is meant to say something its going to happen or something is meant to me done and that it don't. However, Butler argues that these rules, norms and prohibitions, are the ones that will take us to the fact that "the injunction to be a given gender produces necessary failures", because the limits that they impose, which we must follow, are going to me tempted to go over them. Judith Butlers talks about gendering as a performative process, which are hegemonic. Austin is the man to talk about in concern to infelicity and in the other hand felicity. Ideology and ideological state apparatuses, especially pp 170-186.
Common topics in this essay:
Judith Butlers,
Regarding Foucault,
Leading Butlerīs,
Betaille Foucault,
Catherine MacKinnon,
Kafkaīs Law,
Judith Butler,
Trouble Butlerīs,
Based Butler,
Butler Judith,
judith butler,
gender trouble,
butler judith,
gender performative,
Ø butler judith,
define gender,
gender identity,
meaning gender,
Ø butler,
preface 1999xiv,
cultural constructed,
trouble feminism subversion,
gender trouble feminism,
feminism subversion identity,
foucault 1973 34,
|
Acceptance Essays
