Religion in schools is generally supported by the public, yet declined by the government.
             Documents 1, 2, 4, and 5 support religion in schools. Document 1 displays the first amendement, which supports the freedom of speech and religion. Document 2 contradicts the government's support for religion, as shown in document 1. From the point of view of a representative, the document points out that the government banned religion from our schools, yet he argues that we are still taught all of the bad things. Document 4 represents the public's opinion. The poll results showed that more than three fourths of the public was in favor of religion in our schools. Document 5 comes from the point of view of a regular teenage part of the public. She thinks religion should be permitted any and everywhere.
             Document 3 does not support religion in schools. This document is a controversy. Two sides had opposing views. The view against religion in schools won. A transcript of the trial would be helpful in determining the exact views of the opposing parties.
             Document 6 is neither supportive, nor against religion in schools. It merely explains the misunderstandings of the controversy (of religion). It's not that you can't pray in school, you just can't do it publicly.
             Documents 1 and 3 actually prove the effects of the government. In document 1, the First Amendment allows the freedom of religion and speech. That should allow religion to be practiced anywhere and anytime. In document 3, though, the Supreme Court rules against the First Amendment, basically. That is the ruling that doesn't allow religion to be practiced in schools.
             Religion in schools is generally supported by the public, but declined by our government. The government should allow it to be practiced due to the First Amendment, but does not allow it due to the Santa Fe vs. Doe ruling in 2000.
             ...