Lenins Communist Revolution
When looking at Russian history and an examination of the Communist Revolution is made, questions may arise as to whether or not it follows the format and points the Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx lays out. Once the initial surface examination is made, the reader can indulge further to find differences between the idea of Communism and the practice of it, according to Lenin. Furthermore, the reader needs to deem the differences as important or not, so that a statement can be made whether the Revolution was truly communist. In addition, looking at the years following the initial start of the Communist Revolution is important to observe if the ideals of Communism were maintained. Lenin did support many aspects of the Communist Manifesto in the revolution. In his speech before the Second All-Russian Congress of Soviets of Workers' and Soldiers' Deputies, he states that there will be a new government, one that is of the workers and peasants and is embodied by them in the Soviet organizations. He also reveals ideas for pu
But then it is seen that the government is taking over industry with ten or more people. The NEP allowed private trade, it allowed many small factories to return to private ownership, and most importantly, it let the peasants sell their surplus foods in the market for a profit. In a true Communist Revolution, is that allowed? Wouldn't this allow potential for personal profit, which may gain more than the rest resulting in a higher class within a system that strives to make equality? It does allow that potential, but it isn't fully revealed how un-communist this Russian Revolution is becoming until the New Economic Policy is applied to Russia. Lenin addressed these issues directly in this speech. " Since the individual does not own the land, it cannot be passed down, therefore abolishing the right of inheritance. Are these aspects of Communism specifically important enough to separate Communism and turn it into something else? No, because they do not effect the essence of equality between the Russian people. This is a problem for the argument towards the Russian Revolution being communist because it directly contradicts what true communism is. The New Economic Policy, or NEP, is where the Russian Revolution was not in a communist revolution even though some ideas of Communism were still strong. Lenin is not cultivating the wastelands, he is not abolishing the distinction between town and country by a more equal distribution of the population over the country, and he is not improving the soil with a common plan. So when asked the question, "Was Lenin's revolution a communist revolution?", it can be said that it roughly started out as one, yet it was modified into something that was not one at all. As well at this time, the Bolsheviks have created a National bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly, they have taken over factories with ten or more people, and the Commissariat of Transportation has taken control of the railways and waterways; the transportation is in the hands of the State.
Common topics in this essay:
Manifesto Lenin,
Russian Revolution,
Communist Revolution,
Soldiers' Deputies,
Communist Manifesto's,
Karl Marx,
Lenin Furthermore,
Commissariat Transportation,
communist revolution,
Communist Manifesto,
,
revolution communist,
russian revolution,
communist manifesto,
lenin's revolution communist,
lenin's revolution,
common plan,
idea communism,
true communism,
economic policy,
allow potential,
russian revolution communist,
revolution communist revolution,
|
Acceptance Essays
