Execution of Death Penalty
The use of capital punishment has been a permanent fixture in society since the earliest civilizations. It has been used for various crimes ranging from the desertion of soldiers during wartime to the more heinous crimes of serial killers. Past civilizations used execution very often because they did not have enough place and money for incarceration of criminals (Hood, 13). However, the mere fact that this brutal form of punishment has been the policy of many nations in the past does not subsequently warrant its implementation in today's society. And although the death penalty is legalized under some circumstances by some countries today, it is a wrong type of punishment, since it has no scientific proof of acting as a deterrent and no possibility of reformation, but has risks in terms of executing innocent people. Moreover, it damages public's trust in government and causes people to fear government. Therefore, none of the circumstances which governments usually bring in the foreground to justify death penalty could be a factor supporting the death penalty. The most common circumstance where the death penalty has been applied is the case of homicides. Here, one of the most paradoxical features of the death penalty deba
In addition, in today's society an effective punishment should be considered as 'reformative' (Morris and Rothman, 3). In other words, 'Respect for life' seems the most important concept for being 'against' and 'for' the death penalty. So, the only point in which the death penalty makes sense is showing people's revenge. This is why it is very distinct from other punishments. Therefore, it is possible that executions in treason cases can lead to new treason cases breaking in turn that 'extra' unity. So, considering social and political balances it is better not to use it. The vast majority of countries in Western Europe and North and South America, more than 80 nations worldwide have abandoned death penalty considering all the aspects mentioned throughout this essay. This perspective is the easiest way for some governments which are not able to cope with violent crimes, whereas it is possible to reform the murderer criminal in a logical way by applying psycho-therapies and giving him useful jobs for his long-term imprisonment. Conversely, the experts say that it usually causes a political and social high tension which might result in new terrorist attacks (Nathanson, 76). Many people believe that fear of death deters people from committing serious crimes. And the use of death penalty in a 'civilized' society, therefore, should no longer be acceptable under any circumstance. People on both sides see themselves as defenders of the value of life. There is no doubt about the fact that terrorism targets the foundations of society and creates too many victims, but using death penalty in such cases can be only based on the rightful revenge of society and cannot be based on professional opinions.
Common topics in this essay:
Wikberg Rideau,
,
Morris Rothman,
Studies Deterrence,
death penalty,
Albert Pierrepoint,
South America,
Wilbert Deathmen,
Publishers Jersey,
Publications Bombay,
Recent Studies,
studies deterrence death,
recent studies,
deterrence death penalty,
deterrence death,
recent studies deterrence,
innocent people,
studies deterrence,
people fear,
penalty makes,
'for' death penalty,
aims justice system,
long-term imprisonment,
effective deterrent,
extra unity,
|
Acceptance Essays
