Supreme Court Roles
The Constitution was set up for all citizens of the United States of America to recognize their rights. They were granted natural rights and civil liberties. However, throughout history, the Supreme Court has expanded or limited constitutional civil liberties in the United States. Through cases such as the Brown vs. Broad of Education of Topeka (1954) and the Miranda vs. Arizona (1966), the Supreme Court was able to expand the constitutional civil liberties of the citizens. Thus, the United States began to show that there was equality, freedom and rights given to these citizens. In the early 1950's, racial segregation in public schools was a custom across America. Although all the schools in a given district were supposed to be equal, most black schools were far inferior to their white counterparts. In Topeka, Kansas, a black third-grader named Linda Brown had to walk one mile through a railroad switchyard to get to her black elementary school, even though a white elementary school was only seven blocks away. Linda's father, Oliver Brown, tried to enroll her in the white elementary school, but the principal of the school refused. The NAACP was eager to assist the Browns, as it had long wanted to challenge segregation in public s
Board of Education decision did not abolish segregation in other public areas, such as restaurants and restrooms, nor did it require desegregation of public schools by a specific time. The Board of Education's defense was that, because segregation in Topeka and elsewhere pervaded many other aspects of life, segregated schools simply prepared black children for the segregation they would face during adulthood. The came before the Supreme Court under Chief Justice Earl Warren in 1966 because it dealt with the rights of criminals and no other cases before dealt with the issues that were being addressed. You have the right to be speak to an attorney, and to have an attorney present during any questioning. It was a giant step towards complete desegregation of public schools. " The Court imposed these limitations upon law enforcement officers for the purpose of ensuring that criminal suspects do not waive constitutional rights as a result of not knowing how to properly exercise them. Although he was found guilty because of his confession, Miranda appealed his case on the fact that he did not know his Fifth Amendment rights. In 1963 a poor Mexican immigrant by the name of Ernesto Miranda was arrested for kidnapping and raping a young woman. However, it did expand constitutional civil liberties for the citizens. The Supreme Court's decision did expand civil liberties granting that school segregation was unconstitutional, thus it led to a new movement. For those that are convicted of a crime, their rights are read to them and they are allowed to have a fair and speedy trial by the due process of law. Following his arrest for raping the young woman, Miranda confessed to the crime after being interrogated by police for two hours. The Court struck down the "separate but equal" doctrine of Plessy for public education, ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, and required the desegregation of schools across America.
Common topics in this essay:
Miranda Rights,
Fifth Amendment,
Supreme Court,
Ernesto Miranda,
Oliver Brown,
Fourteenth Amendment,
Board Education,
Board Education's,
Education Topeka,
Earl Warren,
civil liberties,
public schools,
supreme court,
black children,
segregated schools,
fifth amendment,
constitutional civil,
elementary school,
constitutional civil liberties,
segregation public,
brown vs broad,
desegregation public,
vs broad education,
education topeka 1954,
white elementary school,
|
Acceptance Essays
