Bioethics/genetic engineering
By the year 2025, the world's population will be approximately 7.4 billion people and 2 million clones. What seems like something from a bad science fiction movie could, indeed, be a reality based on how quickly technology is growing in the area of genetics. However, such growth brings forth many concerns- primarily ethical and religious issues but holes in the legal system as well. Although there are many developments dealing with genetics that deserve mention, the more pressing topics that have struck public controversies and legal dilemmas are stem cell research and cloning (particularly, human). Stem cell research requires experimentation on embryos, causing much turbulence in the area of ethics. Scientists are trying to harvest cells from the embryos because the cells are "blank" and have not developed into any type of particular cell. With this in mind, there is the possibility to manipulate the immature cells and make them do the job of a certain body cell; such as nerve cells to fix damaged brains cells and, therefore, work at eliminating Alzheimer and Parkinson's disease. Although no cure has been acquired from the research so far, that is n
In the 1970's, people began to fear that recombinant DNA research may release harmful organisms. Other Genetic Technologies that have Spurred Controversies Over the Years There are other genetic technologies that are disturbing the world of ethics, and have been for years. Another example of exceptional cases is that of a child's life. Harvesting stem cells consequently kills the embryo and thus sets fire to the opposition of pro-life advocates and religious leaders. Moreover, as the donor, the clone will suffer limited discomfort and develop into a healthy child. Does a cloned human have a soul? Is it right for humans to "play God" and create other humans in ways alternative to sexual procreation? If all babies are innocent at birth, do humans have the right to use fetuses, even if they have already died, for scientific research? The list of concerns goes on and on. Issues surrounding the value of a child and the over all integrity of humans have also arisen. Indirect options reviewed by the NBAC include cooperation by the private sector, both research and clinical, to be subject to regular inspections. Such areas affected are: Family Life- With ways to determine and/or create a child's gender, temperance, and even appearance through genetic manipulation, the value of having a child could decrease dramatically. Subordinate to federal law are the state laws, which have the power to restrict even privately funded research. As a compromise, an appeal can be made to a view of human reason, rather than exclusively to a religious source of knowledge such as scripture. Conclusion In conclusion, as experiments and developments in the scientific world continue to grow, so will objections and concerns within the world of ethics follow, especially within the field of genetics. In regard to funding, as far a federal money (a. The Roslin experiment brought the possibility of developing a way to create human clones asexually. a taxpayer's money) is concerned, President Clinton decided in 1994 that the National Institutes of Health should deny funding to any research that involves creating embryos solely for experimental use and destroying them afterwards.
Common topics in this essay:
Ian Wilmut,
Alzheimer Parkinson's,
Groups- Pro-life/,
Spurred Controversies,
Review Board,
Genetic Engineering,
Research Stem,
Ethics Spurred,
Advisory Commission,
Beliefs- Prompted,
stem cell,
human cloning,
stem cell research,
cell research,
child bone marrow,
stem cells,
genetic research,
life affected,
embryos solely,
body cell,
adult cells,
bone marrow transplant,
harvesting stem cells,
harvesting stem,
|
Acceptance Essays
