Same Sex Marriages
"A loving man and woman in a committed relationship can marry. Dogs, no matter what their relationship, are not allowed to marry. How should society treat gays and lesbians in committed relationships? As dogs or as humans?" (religioustolerance.org 2). This is one opinion of many gays and lesbians out there who want to be treated like equals and be able to marry the women or men that they love with the same rights as the heterosexual couples in the US. President Bush wants a constitutional amendment prohibiting gays from marrying each other. Marriage between the same sex should be legalized because they are equal to heterosexual couples and should be treated so, and because President Bush is banning same sex marriages for the wrong reasons. Those opposed to same-sex marriages say marriage is a union that can only exist between a man and a woman. Therefore, enlarging and altering the definition of marriage in order to include same-sex partners discriminates against heterosexual marriage and the family. This deprives them of their social and legal recognition as the fundamental and irreplaceable basis of society. Moreover, same sex weddings threaten the institution of marriage and thus society.
The demographics of those who most often vote in elections lines up very neatly with the demographics of those individuals who are least likely to support equal marriage(Detroit Free Press 1). The federal government separately contributes an additional 1,000 benefits to them. Bush is making his decision for more personal and political benefits than making a decision for the good of his country. The President seems to feel free to use that respected institution for political ends. If successful, it would be the first time that the Constitution was ever modified to detract rights from a targeted group. One man, President Bush, should not be able to ban something so sacred and important like same sex marriage just because of his personal opinion, but for the good of the country. Gays want to marry precisely because they see marriage as important: they want the symbolism that marriage brings, the extra sense of obligation and commitment, as well as the social recognition. Even with civil unions, gays and lesbians do not get the same right that they deserve. Not only would it add social stability, but it would show people that everyone is equal. Gay and lesbian couples have the exact same feelings for one another that a heterosexual couple would have, and therefore would like to show there commitment by marriage. This does not give equal rights to gays or lesbians that heterosexual couples receive which shows that the government doubts their constitutional right. The civil rights movement of the 1960's fought for interracial couples to be able to marry-and they won. " Same sex weddings should not be determined by a man who puts his personal opinion and political status in front of what is best for his country.
Common topics in this essay:
President Bush,
Olga Vives,
DontAmendnet Bush,
Gay Marriage,
Free Press,
Committee Loven,
George Bush's,
Constitution President,
John Aravosis,
Washington Post,
heterosexual couples,
president bush,
gays lesbians,
civil unions,
constitutional amendment,
couples receive,
add social stability,
rights heterosexual,
gays marry,
personal opinion,
federal government,
rights heterosexual couples,
rights privileges married,
heterosexual couples receive,
|
Acceptance Essays
