Got School?
Kimberly Moore, an early childhood consultant, (2003) once said, "effective communication between parents and teachers is an essential part of your child's success in school." Has the controversy of this issue led parents to believe they are the only ones who can teach their children properly? Do parents today attempt to take control of their child's education, allowing them to only participate in home-school activities? There are many supported arguments concerning whether children are better off home-schooled or put in a public school. Regardless of which opinions take which side, the initial reasoning behind each stated idea is intended for the child's benefit.One argument against public schools is that the parent-teacher relationships are not meeting the standards. Many of the teachers blame the parents for not being involved. On the other hand, some parents blame the teachers for not allowing the parents to be involved in their child's education. Peter Cookson Jr., Dean of the Graduate School of Education at Lewis & Clark College (2004), states, "blaming parents for perceiving shortcomings in their children is one of the oldest teacher strategies for escaping responsibility." Cookson's idea helps us
While many public schools encourage parent-teacher relationships and offer extra curricular activities, home-schooling offers children individually-paced, one-on-one teaching, and, often, religious principles. The Economist (2004) states that "The HSLD showed that three-quarters of home-educated adults aged 18-24 have taken college level courses compared with 46% of the general population" (George Bush's secret army, 2004). Statics also prove that home-schooled children tend to excel more in academics. The child is able to work at his or her own pace, and does not have to sit through teacher's discussions that relay their personal views rather then an unbiased lesson. Martha agreed that part of the reason she likes to home-school her son is that she can imply Christian morals to his lessons that he would not get by attending a public school. Although this mother believes in using Christian values, not all home-schoolers practice the same lessons. Martha McGaugh, my aunt and mother of two, home-schools her oldest child. Each has its pros and cons, but he individual student makes the best out of the situation they favor. For example, when a class is discussing the views on economic growth, the teacher may only teach her radical ideas of establishing work in space rather then giving another example from a more conservative idea. Today's generation has come to the realization that the work done in public schools could be done in half the time if done at home. Why go to school and spend 50% of your time doing busy-work when you could complete all your work in a few hours at home and have the rest of the day to work or enjoy your afternoons? Some parents argue that public school is a waste of educational time and see it more beneficial to devote their time to educating their children on their own. The main argument concerning home-schooling and public schools is proper education. Whether a child should be home-schooled or attend public school depends on the child's personality. It depends on how the child perceives education.
Common topics in this essay:
George Bush's,
Martha McGaugh,
Kimberly Moore,
Clark College,
NCAA Division,
Education Week,
Greek Latin,
Ashlin Carini,
public schools,
John Holt,
Association HSLD,
public school,
george bush's secret,
bush's secret,
child's education,
secret army,
attend public,
parents involved,
bush's secret army,
george bush's,
army 2004,
secret army 2004,
attend public schools,
offer extra curricular,
communication march,
|
Acceptance Essays
