The relationship between the United States and the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) has been very unstable. With most of the international conflicts that occurred during and after the Cold War, the United States has constantly found itself on the defensive with the U.N. and other nations. Where American idealism was the motivating force behind the creation of the United Nations during the waning days of World War II, it was American values that shaped the world organization. However, with the mist of the Cold War arising, the United Nations mirrored the increasing antagonistic competition between the United States and the Soviet Union. United States foreign policy revolved around the prevention of communism and Soviet expansion while the foreign policy goals of the United Nations began to stray away from U.S. policies.
             With the beginning of the decolonization process emerging, hostile Third World coalitions began to form (which the Soviets allied with) with strong anger towards both European powers and the United States. As a result, U.S. attitude toward the United Nations was filled with wariness and hostility, thus, the U.S. started to become less multilateral and more unilateral in making foreign policy decisions. Although the United States retreated back towards U.N. policies at the end of the Cold War (Reagan Administration), the U.S. has once again has determined its decision making on global security without the support of the United Nations. Despite the fact that the mere creation of the U.N. was to encourage and ensure international security and peace, key questions must be considered--- whether or not UNSC approval is necessary for a major power to enter into a conflict or participate in humanitarian intervention. In addition, is the Security Council able to determine what conflicts are just or ethical? In order to answer these important questions, the relationship between the U.S. and UNSC during the Korea...