Against School Critique
In John Taylor Grotto's Against School, he argues that the public schooling system cripples children. He makes arguments that the public schooling system suppresses children from learning at their maximum potential. He offers home schooling as an effective alternative to the public schooling system, stating that the freedom the students are given in home schooling will motivate them to learn more capably and learn things that will actually serve a purpose to them later in life. While Grotto argues that home schooling is the best way for a child to receive a good education, there are various reasons why public schools provide optimal education. Grotto claims that a big issue of why public schools are so detrimental to a student's learning is because school structure promotes boredom. He states that going to class six times a day, five days a week, and nine months a year for twelve years is a structure that bored kids and didn't train them to learn material constantly, but instead taught them not to think at all. Also the fact that the students were not interested in learning the "stupid" material but were more interested in getting good grades caused the teachers to lose interest in teaching whi
ch is the reason boredom exists everywhere in classrooms. While this is a valid argument and all these famous people were in fact home schooled, Grotto doesn't take into account that the majority of the famous and successful people were not home schooled and stem from at least a background with a secondary education. It is true that both kids and teachers get bored, but boredom is an inevitability that comes with everything. He is insisting that we should home school our children so they will become independent and learn at their own pace and eventually reach their individual maximum potential. The adults are bored but they are the ones who construct our buildings, drill oil for our cars, manage our water and power supplies, and do other things that are necessary for people to manage their lives everyday. The students must not only be smart and knowledgeable, as they would learn to be in a home schooling environment, but also be social and get along well with others, as they would learn in a public schooling environment, so they can succeed in the corporate world. Schools promote competition and this competition instills a desire into children to get good grades, forcing them to study as much as possible. He argues that home schooling helps children learn the information they want to learn at their own pace while not being put behind bars and driven through a twelve year wringer. Going to public schools will force kids to interact with other students and help them develop the social skills necessary to eventually go to a secondary school and college and network with other people. The exposure that students will have with other students and the friendships that they make in schools will provide them with the foundation of good social skills they need to thrive in our society. He bases many of his assumptions off of his personal experience alone and not the good experiences that others may have gone through with public education. The social skills that these kids develop will also be crucial to them in the work place.
Common topics in this essay:
Grotto's School,
Abraham Lincoln,
home schooling,
schooling system,
public schooling,
home schooled,
public schooling system,
schooling environment,
home schooling environment,
public schools,
social skills,
own pace,
schools provide,
schooled kids learn,
people home schooled,
argues home schooling,
past doesn't,
|
Acceptance Essays
