Slavery caused the Civil War
Lincoln stated that slavery was "somehow" the cause of the civil war. To what extent is this a valid statement?The statement that slavery was somehow the cause of the civil war is definitely a true one, and it can be said that the validity of Lincoln's comments on that day was definitely proven to be true. Slavery was the main and primarily most important cause of the war, and although other factors did influence the war's outcome, Slavery's cause and hence Lincoln's statement can be considered true.The chief and immediate cause of the war was slavery. Southern states, including the 11 states that formed the Confederacy, depended on slavery to support their economy. This already provides a positive outlook in regards to realizing slavery as being the primary cause of the American Civil war.But firstly, we need to look at what exactly built slavery up to be the cause of the war, and subsequently supported Lincoln's quote; Many events in particular brought forward the issue of slavery, it was the economic support for the entirety of the Southern States, and greatly benefited the agricultural abilities of the South. Not only did slavery benefit the South in a financial way, but morally it was considered sound, as if
The Confederate States began to seize United States' Army posts and arsenals in their new country. But Fort Sumter was one of the strongest United States' bases in the South and it refused to surrender. They believed that many people in the North were willing to assist runaway slaves rather than report finding them and returning them to their owners. (It must be kept in mind that despite the general dislike of the slave trade in the north, there were still many active supporters of it living in those parts). The Pro-slavery group basically argued that God had ordained and sanctioned the practice of holding slaves throughout the Old Testament. The South was very determined to maintain its agriculturally based way of life and saw the North as a threat. In 1860, Abraham Lincoln became the first Republican President of the United States. Despite this so-called justification of slavery, it provoked the abolitionist so much that in the second half of he eighteenth century when the British colonists were developing arguments, independence and just treatment, the movement for the abolition of slavery gained in popularity. This meant that neither group could pass laws against the other's wishes. Despite the potential and very real benefits of slavery to the Southern states, the Northern states saw the Slave trade and slavery itself as a cruel and inhumane act. The effect of this fear and mistrust actually had quite a bit impact on relations between the Northern and Southern States; the Southern states blamed a rebellion in 831 on the North, and subsequently many northern books were banned in the South and the mails were checked for abolitionist literature. At this time there were an equal number of slave and non-slave states in the United States. Dredd Scott was a slave who in the 1850s was brought into Illinois, where slavery was forbidden. If Missouri were to be admitted as a slave state, it could potentially upset the balance. This of course, simply outraged the Northern States even more, especially the abolitionist groups who were fighting to rid the Southern states of slavery altogether.
Common topics in this essay:
Missouri Compromise,
,
Supreme Court,
American Civil,
Civil War,
North South,
Northern Slave,
Eli Whitney,
Lloyd Garrison,
Testament Despite,
civil war,
cause civil war,
cause civil,
missouri compromise,
slave trade,
cause war,
north south,
brought forward,
somehow cause civil,
join union,
united states',
missouri compromise 1820,
northern southern,
fugitive slave act,
applied join union,
|
Acceptance Essays
