No Smoking In Public
Imagine sitting in a restaurant, unable to enjoy a meal due to the cloud of smoke coming from a neighbor's table. The fact that there was not a designated area for smokers has put the smoker and the non-smoker in an uncomfortable situation. Smoking should be banned in public places, because non-smokers have a right to clean air, and because second hand smoke is more dangerous than actually smoking a cigarette. The idea of ban smoking in public areas is totally right. Smoker thinks that their right is being violated by the idea of banned smoking in public. They feel that it is their right to smoke when and wherever they want. What about non smoker? On the other hand, non smokers feel that smokers violate their rights of breathe with fresh air and endanger their lives. The EPA (En
A recent study from Harvard University reports that, "ETS may even double a person's risk of heart disease. A study, published in the medical journal Tobacco Control, found that smokers are up to four times more likely to have a stroke than people who do not smoke, but up to six times more likely than those who are not exposed to passive smoking. There is evidence that ETS is even more toxic than mainstream tobacco smoke. It comes down to a decision between the healths of a whole nation versus the freedom of a minority. And still, people can actually claim they have the right to expose their fellow man to such disgusting and dangerous chemicals. ETS releases the same 4,000 chemicals as smoke that is directly inhaled, but in even greater quantity. " So there must be some sort of restriction of laws on smoking in public places to help protect nonsmoker from the dangers of secondhand smoke. " Secondhand smoke also knows as ETS (Environmental Tobacco Smoke). "Some smoker said that smoking directly from the tip of a cigarette is more affective than secondhand smoker. Smoking should absolutely be banned in public and workplaces. According to the managing director of the American Lung Association, Garrison: "Secondhand smoke causes lung cancer, increase the risk of heart disease, and adversely affects the health of youths and unborn children. A ban would not only improve the lives of us non-smokers, but would encourage those causing the problem to help themselves before it too late from worsen their health.
Common topics in this essay:
Tobacco Control,
,
Garrison Secondhand,
Harvard University,
Protection Agency,
secondhand smoke,
smoking public,
Tobacco Smoke,
risk heart disease,
smoke ets,
heart disease,
risk heart,
banned public,
tobacco smoke,
|
Acceptance Essays
