comparison between Un and EU
The purpose of this paper is to make a general overview of the main differences between the United Nations and the European Union. According to this aim, this essay will be divided into five parts: after a brief introduction, I´m going to deal with three aspects in which these two entities differ, namely their Origins and the relationship with the Sovereignty of the member states, the means to implement decisions in the Security field and the decision-making process within the bodies of the two entities. Then I will try to make some conclusions based on the areas compared. The most important international organizations in the world today are the United Nations (UN) and its affiliated bodies, and the European Union (EU). Both of them were born in the aftermath of the second World War, in order to avoid new massacres and destructions. However they have different origins and have developed different aims and structures. On the one side the United Nations officially came into existence in 1945. The aim of this Organization, as the preamble of the Charter claims, is to prevent the future generations from the burden of War. In addition Art.1 of the Charter provides four main purposes, namely to maintain international peace and secu
For several years, UN peacekeepers have been stationed in Congo, without a mandate, however, to engage in military actions. In response, the Panel proposed a renewed commitment to UN peacekeeping on the part of Member States; significant institutional change, and increased financial support. The Treaty of Nice failed to improve the means for intergovernmental decision-making within the European Council. With reference on how Security policies are implemented by the two entities, it can be said that the primary means through which the UN act in the domain of Peace and Security is PEACEKEEPING, a means by which the international community can encourage the establishment of sustainable peace in places and where conflict threatens or has been recently subdued. In order to understand the global impact of such an institution it is important to take into consideration the main features of its action: Universality, which gives to all Countries a voice when the major policy decisions are made; Impartiality, that means that the UN does not represent any national or commercial interest; Global presence since the UN has the largest network of country offices for the delivery of development assistance. In the aftermath of the second world war there were at least three different approaches: the federalist one was based on the removal of the national states to create an European Federation. This last assumption is important to take into consideration the second difference between the UN and EU. Therefore the UN is a global forum where countries come together to address common problems. However the creation of an European Army is still considered the last step to complete the integration process and increase the role of the EU in the international relations. On the one side the UN is an intergovernmental institution of sovereign states which cooperate to deal with global problems and universal values. Apparently the UN procedure is less articulated since there are two main organs and the competences are clearly shared, while within the EU there is a less clear role of the three main bodies and the enlargement will make also more difficult to reach the necessary consensus. The decision of the 15 member states (with the exceptions of Denmark and the UK), to abandon their national currencies for the Euro is therefore a decision of fundamental political significance. However the draft constitution contains some welcome changes to improve efficiency and leadership. Thus the shift to a single currency can well explain the difference between the UN and EU: there is no sovereign country anywhere in the world that does not have its own currency. I argued that an example of this difference could be the introduction of the single European currency, through which an European monetary policy and mostly a political common dimension came to existence.
Common topics in this essay:
Security Council,
Authorities Officially,
European Council,
Council Practicable,
European Union,
UN EU,
UN Charter,
Union According,
Universality Countries,
United Nations,
united nations,
security council,
un peacekeeping,
european union,
un eu,
peace security,
decision-making process,
peacekeeping operations,
integration process,
terms sovereignty,
united nations peacekeeping,
aftermath world war,
common position support,
united nations un,
international criminal court,
|
Acceptance Essays
