New Modern Architecture
Architecture will never achieve some perfect state where everyoneaccepts that the one best form has now been achieved. The reason for thisis that what is considered best changes as people change. This aspectapplies to architecture as much as it does to any other art form or anyitem produced in society. People in one generation may strive for acertain perfect form and they may even achieve it in their lifetime.However, even if they do, this form does not become the one perfectstandard, never changing again. Instead, the next generation considerswhat has been created before and strives to achieve something. Ifarchitecture is considered as art, this is the same process that occurswith all other forms of art. For example, literature created centuries agodoes not remain as the one perfect form for literature. Shakespeare's workis still considered great, but the writers of today rarely create workssimilar to Shakespeare's. Instead, they create works that reflect modernsociety, while possibly taking aspects of Shakespeare's work and buildingon them. This creates a continual process of change, where one form growsinto others. If architecture is considered as practical rather than
These issues of the social and cultural aspects missing were raised andrecognized as problems. This may lead to buildings of the futurebeing created in a more standard form, as a means of offering theimpression that everyone is connected. In response, they returned to the ideasof Corbusier. This new style avoided the problem of lack of originality by choosingnot to follow standard designs. In short, the design began to represent the individuals themselves. While Peter and Alison Smithson hadoriginally rejected the ideas of Corbusier, they later found themselvesreturning to his ideas. However, while the meeting before hadconsidered the progress a triumph, this meeting began to look at theproblems that had been created. One of thearchitects in the group was Bakema and his views are a good representationof the ideals of the group. Banham describes the New Brutalism style of Alisonand Peter Smithson by describing one of their buildings: "The floors and roof slabs are built up of pre-cast concrete slabs, and these are left as exposed concrete on the underside. They emergedafter the breakdown of CIAM in 1956. This is anatural part of human thinking, with people tending to notice what iswrong, rather than what is right. "[5]This description shows how the architecture maintains a solid look andavoids appearing frivolous, like the new modernist style they are trying toavoid. This is a view lackingfrom the earlier CIAM architects. Again, the same focus was maintained with the group attempting to developan ideal situation from a practical view. In considered their ending, it seems that they played the role thatwas necessary at the time.
Common topics in this essay:
Modern Architecture,
Peter Smithson,
CIAM VIII,
ARM Kovac,
Shakespeare's Instead,
Team Firstly,
Brutalism Brutalism,
Team X's,
Instead Team,
IV Corbusier,
ciam architects,
meeting ciam,
Ÿ acceptance,
generation architects,
current architecture,
earlier ciam,
modern architecture,
ideas ciam,
modern buildings,
buildings created,
earlier ciam architects,
ciam architects Ÿ,
created ciam architects,
focus functional aspect,
ciam architects team,
|
Acceptance Essays
