Affirmative Action Should be Eliminated
Proponents of affirmative action argue that affirmative action isnecessary to create a "level playing field" for all Americans because it isa way of redressing discrimination that persists in spite of civil rightslaws and constitutional guarantees. Minorities and females still don'tmake as much money as men do and we live in a society that often hasdifficulty accepting individuals with different race, color, religion, sex,or national origin. "Operational needs" often present cases whenaffirmative action is required for effective job performance. One exampleof "operational needs" is a police force which has to interact with thecommunity. Officers who belong to the same
" Under some programs, women "shall be presumed to be socially and economically disadvantaged individuals," too. While it was a noble effort tohelp the disadvantaged, the major benefactors under its present form canoften be the middle and upper class. And the government can "encourage" its contractors and grantees to deposit their money with you as part of its affirmative action program. " In certain circumstances, affirmative action creates one more form ofdiscrimination, reverse discrimination. ethic group as neighborhoodresidents can function more effectively because of the hostilities andsuspicions that often exist between members of different ethic groups. " Even the Center forEqual Opportunity is opposed to affirmative action because it has been suchan unfair windfall for wealthy minorities that are finding ways to takeadvantage of the system as summarized below: "According to the Code of Federal Regulations: "Individuals who certify that they are members of named groups (Black, Hispanic, Native American, Asian-Pacific, Sub-continental-Asian) are to be considered socially and economically disadvantaged. "The most under-represented groupof Americans at the nation's top colleges and colleges isn't blacks orHispanics, but students from lower-income families. So, by definition, if you fit into any of these categories, you're economically disadvantaged even if you own a bank- in fact, especially if you own a bank. It's time to replace affirmativeaction with more innovate ways to resolve discrimination and to help thetruly needy. However, affirmative action really is all about quotas rather thaneliminating race as a factor in the decision making process. The benefactors ofaffirmative action are predominately middle and upper class individualsthat don't need any special treatment. And, quotasare unconstitutional because they violate the equal protection clause ofthe 14th Amendment, equal protection under the law.
Common topics in this essay:
,
Asian-Pacific Sub-continental-Asian,
Equal Opportunity,
affirmative action,
Regulations Individuals,
economically disadvantaged,
middle upper class,
socially economically disadvantaged,
middle upper,
equal protection,
upper class,
socially economically,
|