The Death Penalty
The death penalty has existed for many years now, most countries have abolished it, but still in present time, some states in the U.S.A. still enforce this law. In the past the law has used such cruel methods of killing criminals who have been caught by the law committing severely cruel crimes such as rape, murder or any act of terrorism. These criminals have been submitted to torturous as punishments for their crimes, such as chopping heads, gas chambers, deadly injections and even the electric chair. The actual purpose of the death penalty is to deal with those criminals which society have no hope in them and simply want to get rid of them. The death penalty is meant to make criminals pay for their crimes, to prevent them from committing further crimes and to deter other criminals from committing the same crimes. As a result to this issue are the discussions among the member of today's society to see whether this punishment is correct or if it is an act of cruelty. First of all the death penalty is meant for criminals to pay for their crimes. People who commit any type of serious crime such as rape, murder or any act of terrorism are considered dangerou
These groups seem to believe that with the death penalty in function, that it doesn't seem to have lowered the criminal rate. They also say that in jail, all one's freedoms are taken away and lefrancthey'll be controlled like little babies. For this reason, the only way of making sure completely that a criminals who is caught for murder or any other serious crimes doesn't keep on committing them again, is by executing them. The propose of having a criminal justice system is to protect the rights of life, liberty and property of all citizens. Does the death penalty really reduce crimes? What is for sure is that if crime is not controlled or reduced, in the future there could appear new problems associated with crime that society may not know how to respond towards them and can become a serious problem. Then the criminal rate would rise and life would be chaos. They argue that this punishment is too harsh and only shows more violence which can only lead to more crime. People oppose the punishment mostly because it is an act of cruelty, and that no human being deserves this punishment. They consider the possibility of executing the wrong person, an innocent person. Punishment makes one less likely to break the rules. But the reality is that if a criminal is sent to jail, he serves his sentence, and then is released. I also believe that the death penalty does make criminals pay for there crimes. If this case would occur of a criminal repeating himself, the best thing to have done would have been to execute him the first time caught. A criminal who has killed an innocent person at least must pay for it by being executed by the federal law system, "eye for an eye".
Common topics in this essay:
Death Penalty,
Shalt Kill,
North America,
death penalty,
Capital Punishment,
committing crimes,
Hutchison English,
criminals pay crimes,
criminals committing crimes,
criminal rate,
capital punishment,
pay crimes,
criminals pay,
criminals committing,
criminals caught,
penalty meant criminals,
penalty meant,
death penalty meant,
meant criminals,
people death penalty,
|
Acceptance Essays
