Female Genital Mutilation and Male Circumcision Should Both Be Abolished
There has been countless news reports and television programmingdiscussing the horrors of female circumcision or female genital mutilation. However, there has been very little in the main stream press regarding thepractice of male circumcision. Female genital mutilation is no more of ahuman rights violation than male circumcision , therefore both should be Although, genital mutilations are usually referred to as a culturalpractice, there is increasing evidence that this innocent and benign labelactually evades, dismisses and covers-up the horrific effects thesemutilations have upon a child's psyche and soma, and, moreover present avery real danger to the child's health.[1] Thus, one wonders how such apractice ever began in the first place. People or cultures who engage insuch practices view them as an essential right of passage and often animportant requirement for a marriage partner, while those who do notpractice genital circumcision view the practice with disbelief, horrifiedthat any human would willingly permit such a thing to be performed on hisor her child.[2] So, just where did these practices originate' According to history and archaeology, together with the "
[32]Women with Type III genital mutilation have a firm band of tissue replacingthe labia and obliteration of the urethra and vaginal openings, moreover,these women have the most severe medical complications. "[41] From a human rights standpoint, no newborn infant or child should beforced to donate body parts or tissue, such as the foreskin, even if athird party might benefit from such. "[16] Infant circumcisiondid not spread to the Untied States until the late 1800's and early 1900'sonly after allopathic medical doctors recommended it as a cure forchildhood diseases and disorders such as "polio, tuberculosis, bedwetting,and a new syndrome which appeared widely in the medical literature known as'masturbatory insanity. "[19] Furthermore, there is thebelief that the main purpose of circumcision is to reduce the child's"emotional fluidity and energy level, and their ability to experiencemaximal pleasurable genital excitation later in life, a major step intransmuting Homo sapiens into armored Homo normalis. "[18] Moreover, they havediscussed connections to the "male fear of vaginal blood, wheremenstruation is imitated (subincision), or where the male must be rituallyabsolved of contact with poisonous childbirth blood (infant circumcision),or hymenal blood (pubertal circumcision). According toTextor's Cross-Cultural Summary, 1967, cultures that practice male genitalmutilations also possess the following characteristics: High narcissism index Slavery and Castes are present Class stratification is high Land inheritance favors male line Cognatic kin groups are absent Patrilineal descent is present Female barrenness penalty is high Bride price is present Father has family authority Polygamy is present Marital residence near male kin Painful female initiation rites are present Segregation of adolescent boys is high Oral anxiety potential is high Average satisfaction potential is low Speed of attention to infant needs is low High God present, active, supportive of human morality[21] According to James DeMeo in his article "The Geography of GenitalMutilations," the time frame and location of origins of female genitalmutilations are most likely identical to that of male genital mutilations,"given their similar distributions, similar cross-cultural aspects, andsimilar psychological motifs," the use of each of which being "mandated andwidely expanded by groups where dominance of the sexual live of children byadults, and females by males, was most extreme. Circumcision should be done only on infants who are stable and healthy. To make an informed choice, parents of all male infants should be given accurate and unbiased information and be provided the opportunity to discuss this decision. "[13] Across the Near East, mutilations appeared beforethe "eruptions of Moslem armies in the 600s A. [11] Moreover, in regions where the ritualpractice remained important to social institutions and emotional roots,"the pain of the mutilation was feared as a puberty/marital rite," and sothe practice was shifted into infancy. "[43]Furthermore, this practice violates the 'sanctity of the individual,' bydenying the infant or child the right to bodily security and integrity,something the parent nor anyone, "even by proxy via the medical profession"has the right to do and in any other contexts would be seen andacknowledged as child abuse. [30] Type I orsunna is traditional Arabic and is the least extreme form, consisting of asubtotal clitoridectomy of varying degrees, involving "excision of the skin surrounding the clitoris with or without excision of part of or the entireclitoris.
Common topics in this essay:
Genital Mutilations,
Policy Statement',
Americans16 Infant,
,
Medical Practice,
Type IV,
Africa Oceania,
Type III,
Arabia Yemen,
Near East,
genital mutilations,
genital mutilation,
female genital,
male genital,
male circumcision,
male genital mutilations,
male female,
female genital mutilations,
human rights,
female genital mutilation,
practice genital,
infant child,
medical benefits,
potential medical benefits,
genital mutilations found,
|
Acceptance Essays
