Victims, Offenders, and the Law
By the time most of us reach adulthood we have undergone countlessexperiences which bring home the fact that life issues can rarely andconclusively be categorized as good or bad. The older we get, the largerare the 'grey areas' amongst our collection of absolutes. This fact is mademost apparent in the field of criminal justice. It is while trying toanalyze, evaluate and adjudicate amongst the foibles, frailties, and passionsof humanity that it becomes increasingly difficult to draw a clear linebetween the innocent and the guilty, or the victim and the offender. Laws are formulated to ensure the safety and security of all membersof society. In crimes involving force often more complex elements than meremalice are present. Statistics show that most violent crimes areperpetrated by individuals that have close relationships with the victims.About 50% of all homicides are perpetrated by a member of the victim'sclose family, often parent or spouse. When murders by more distantrelatives, friends and acquaintances are taken into account, this figurerises to about 80%. Whether these are cases of child, wife or parent abuse,the ultimate crime is usually the consequence of a chronic problem.
The actual perverted reality of Ghost Dog'scharacter is overwhelmed by the description of his humanizing qualities andthe fact that he has become quarry instead of the hunter. Movies have romanticized the mafia and mercenaries, depictingthem as individuals caught in a vicious circle rather than people who madethe wrong choices. In the guise of cheap comedythe prevalent attitude of justifiable crime is proliferated. Through such imagery it is made clear that there are circumstances inwhich violence becomes necessary or at least unavoidable. The media has played a large part in thistransformation. The major motivations in the case of male offenders were found to bepossessiveness (m=82%), abuse (m=75%), and arguments (m=63%). '(Provocation, Self-Defense and Defense of Property 2003) More often however the victim and offender are in close relationships. (Provocation, Self-Defense andDefense of Property 2003) Society is of the view that values have changedand so must the application of this rule. He even persuades four of his acquaintances to assist inhis plan both for the money and the pleasure. (Provocation, Self-Defense and Defense of Property 2003) As many as 90% of the women in jail today for killing men had been battered bythose men. Many feel that the 'defense ofprovocation' in its present status embodies archaic sentiments in relationto issues of women and other minorities. It is due to the changes in societal values,culture, and ethical perceptions that such laws need constant review andmodification. (Rasche 1993) Obviously some alterations need to be made to this law sothat the legal process in the case of violent crimes can proceed withjustice. Often included in this group are immigrants, refugeesor persons with disabilities whose very diversity may produce amisconstruction due to language, cultural or other communication barriersleading to violent reaction easily explained by 'provocation. The average prison sentence of men whokill their women partners is 2 to 6 years.
Common topics in this essay:
Defense Property,
,
Saints Day',
Department Corrections,
Criminal Code,
Dog Samurai',
Domestic Violence,
Ghost Dog's,
South Wales,
property 2003,
defense property,
defense property 2003,
Studies Canada,
self-defense defense,
self-defense defense property,
provocation self-defense defense,
provocation self-defense,
defense provocation,
'defense provocation',
victim offender,
kill women,
provocation provocation self-defense,
justify reducing,
women kill,
|
Acceptance Essays
