David Duke and MLK
Many social analysts have argued that Christianity and the Bible lendthemselves to diverse and often conflicting interpretations. This view isborne out in the case of race. Preachers of racial tolerance and those whoadvocate racial extremism have cited the Bible as a source of their beliefs This paper compares and contrasts the racial views of two verydifferent leaders, namely Dr. Martin Luther King and David Duke of themodern Ku Klux Klan. It focuses on the religious and biblicalunderpinnings that both leaders have used to justify their teachings The first part of this paper examines the relationship between raceand religion, as articulated by David Duke. This section looks at how Dukearticulates his racist beliefs through a series of biblicalmisinterpretations. As a result, Duke argues for a God who privileges theCaucasian race over the rest of creation. He also argues for a separationof the races, one that is mandated by the Bible. In addition to discussingDuke's views, this section also looks at how his teachings have influencedthe views of his followers regarding racial matters. The second part then looks Dr. Martin Luther King's te
Thus, in addition to black people and other non-whiteimmigrants, the enemies also included the Pope and Jewish people (Chalmers152). While activists today traditionally view the participation of faith-based organizations in politics with suspicion, it is difficult to separateKing's own preachings from his religious values. Annotated BibliographyChalmers, David Hooded Americanism: The History of the Ku Klux Klan. In the anger thatfollowed, three civil rights workers were murdered in 1964. This orientation allowed Kingto transcend the traditional boundaries of race, religion and time. It is also difficult to imagine howsuch Klan members would give open and honest insight to a researcher who isJewish. This book is arguably one of the most comprehensive histories ofrecent Klan activity . " These claims are both valuableinstruments, available to the oppressed and their advocates (Lischer 151). Sims was also remarkable able tocontrol her emotions, considering the virulence of the statements made bythe small members. More importantly, however, King stressedthat the God had a purpose for the whole world, not just for a chosen few. Oneinteresting tactic employed by the author was the use of primary sources,like editorials from regional newspapers, to illustrate the standing of theKlan in many communities. The new insights of this book, however, comefrom the portraits of the teenage members of a neo-Nazi group in Detroit,many of whom profess open admiration for the Klan. The greatest strength of this book isSims' access to the members themselves. and the Word That Moved America. Thus,whereas Duke argues that the Bible mandates hierarchy and separation, Kingpreached a "social gospel.
Common topics in this essay:
David Duke,
Black Panthers,
King Bible,
Klan Duke,
Bible King,
Duke KKK,
Jewish Ezekiel,
Philadelphia Mississippi,
Whereas Bible,
Pride NAAWP,
david duke,
martin luther,
ku klux klan,
ku klux,
klux klan,
civil rights,
martin luther king,
interpretation bible,
regarding race,
teachings regarding,
white race,
luther king,
klan closely allied,
york oxford university,
dr martin luther,
|
Acceptance Essays
