Cloning
Scientists spend their whole lives attempting to make the world a better place. Nevertheless, the evolution of science is not always appreciated due to misconceptions or simply a lack of accurate information. Human cloning is a prime example of this! "It's probably a bad idea," says Kevin Eggan, one of the team members that made the discovery at the Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge, Massachusetts. However, in an effort to fairly establish a stance for human cloning, one must define and characterize cloning before considering cons and pros of this new technology.Defining cloning is quintessential in determining how detrimental human cloning is to society. The general assumption inculcated by the media perpetrates cloning as a new technology which recreates a perfect Xerox copy of a person. The Association of Reproductive Health Professionals (ARHP) defines cloning as an asexual form of reproduction in which all the child's genes would come from a body cell of a single individual. Other organizations have characterized the simple production of tissues and organs from growing cells as well as the embryo itself as a clone. A
Although human cloning seems to be automated like the way cars are made, clones would not necessarily be treated like machines. Henry David Thoreau suggests that "men have become the tools of their tools" (Blank, 1981). Despite the fact that cloning reproduces the genes of the person being cloned, the clone will not be an exact copy of the ancestor on account of the difference in the environment they grow up in. After suffering so much, infertile couples are finally given the chance to form the family they need with a biologically related child. The fear that cloning would decrease biological diversity is unjust because limitations and regulations would be created so a parent would not be cloned unlimitedly or in excess. In fact, the clones would have free will and no one should have any power over them other than the powers already existing over normal human being. The patient's immune system would not reject the stem cells as foreign materials and they could then be used to treat the patient's illness. s difficult and subtle as it seems to define a clone, there are however many examples of clones in our daily lives. If human cloning is statistically comparable to Dolly's cloning success then human cloning may be a failure. Since most attempts to clone mammals failed it would be almost condemnable to clone human beings. " It is the same way, a normal fetus, when it is outside the womb and alive, has the right not to be discriminated against. The majority of scientists vouch for cloning, whereas the rest of the world is still skeptical about its use. Why should couples who express a desire for clones being enquired about their motives? The media has given cloning very bad and undeserved connotations and ignore to mention the positive aspects of cloning. Even in, in vitro fertilization, a woman who can only supply one egg, and whose chances to be pregnant are therefore minim, could drastically increase her chances with a plethora of spare cloned eggs and ova. Another potential medical benefit of developing cloning would be to study cell differentiation at the same time.
Common topics in this essay:
David Thoreau,
Andrews Professor,
University Wisconsin,
Recombinant DNA,
Professionals ARHP,
Cambridge Massachusetts,
Medical Research,
Technologies ACT,
Bad Scientists,
Institute Medicine,
human cloning,
stem cells,
therapeutic cloning,
person cloned,
reproductive cloning,
harvest stem cells,
cell differentiation,
genetic makeup,
human rights,
human embryos,
cloning people,
|
Acceptance Essays
