Industrial and Retail Security Practices: A Comparison and Contrasting Overview
Since September 11th, the issue of security has been increasingly ofconcern, not just to individual persons, but also to the federalgovernment, as well as private retail and industrial organizations.However, while all of these respective organizations may wish to be safe,quite often retail and industrial organizations have different budgetaryconcerns that affect their risk management analysis of what technicalsecurity measures to deploy, and also in their risk management assets-asin, their analysis of what risky and dangerous behaviors their ownemployees may be most particularly apt to engage in. Retail organizationswill almost always, by organizational necessity, promote profit making asits main security and financial concern, in contrast to the federalgovernment's desire to protect the integrity of the nation over profitmaking. Industrial organizations and service-based industries fromhospitals to schools may fall in between these two security concerns,hoping to both protect the public, protect and screen employees, and also For instance, industrial organizations, when engaging in internal
Butgreater sharing is needed to protect the economic and personal integritynot only of industry and retail operations, but the nation as a whole. They are often, however, limited in this desire tobudgetary constraints on their organization. Technological and Human Approaches to Security-or when should companiesrequire security personnel to take up arms' Certain industrial and retail settings, dependant upon the nature ofthe organization and also depending upon their location, may require armedsecurity guards. But in contrast, a hospital, even a for-profit hospital thatis industrial in nature will have additional security concerns, such asdealing with psychiatric patients. But in privateorganizations that serve wide public interests, such as hospitals andeducational environments-even private educational facilities such asnursery schools this form of security record checking seems defensible andin the public as well as the organization's interest. It is always contextual, although private and public aspects of securitymay have different financial and legal concerns, as well as differenttechnical and human recourses. Employee policy is thus subject todiscipline as defined in employers' codes of conduct. (ASICS, 2004) Even something as apparently innocuous as abuilding with areas prone to concealment from security cameras may requireextra human monitoring, as well as electronic monitoring. For many years, private industry hasindicated that its reluctance to share critical infrastructure informationwith the Federal government is based upon a concern that the informationwill not be adequately protected from disclosure to the public. Companies do not wish to be foundlegally in violation of such statutes. (Goeematt, 2004) Retail organizations have other concerns, such as monitoring employeepilferage of goods. Some organizations haveturned to the government for additional support in their endeavors tomaintain a secure workplace. The predominant concern of most retail operations is protecting theintegrity of the financial aspects of the operation, and thus there may beless of a need to conduct such expensive background checks, unless locationrequires it. (Giles, 2004)Conclusions Thus, there is no perfect definition of security for any organization. Such behavior on the job can be monitored throughelectronic media, rather than through forensic accounting like the abuse ofcompany assets within the structure of a corporate or industrialorganization.
Common topics in this essay:
Introduction September,
Security Officers,
Approaches Security-or,
industrial organizations,
FR- DOC,
retail organizations,
retail industrial,
security officers,
retail industrial organizations,
risk management,
federal government's,
sexual harassment,
company assets,
security financial,
background checks,
|
Acceptance Essays
