Are Human Rights Asian
As Kevin Tan, senior lecturer at the National University of Singapore notes wryly, the debate on Asian values and human rights has become something of a cottage industry since its inception at the UN world Conference on Human Rights in 1994. Both regional documents from the Middle East and Asia challenged the universality of human rights, e Bangkok declaration has since become a manifesto, a kind of declaration of independence from what has been considered the intrusive moralism of the West.A brief summary of the positions articulated at the UN conference and afterwards indicate the divide.Asian representatives (represented by statesmen Mahathir and Lee Kwan Yew) claim that human rights may have a universal dimension but this is limited by its Western genesis. The Bangkok declaration itself best speaks here:While human rights are universal in nature, they must be considered in the context of a dynamiv and evolving process of international norm-setting, bearing in mind the significance of national and regional particularities and various historical, cultural and religious backkgrounds. The West, represented most vociferously by the U.S., responds that human rights are inalienable
Much of contemporary theory is very difficult to follow and dense with academic references. Human rights then is practically required but theoretically unfounded. Since the cultural relativism proposed by Asian representatives is set with "international norm-setting", then the Asian position assumes engagement and challenge, and is not as radical as it has been presented. A justification is a rationale for a norm, i. I think we could find examples here and in our own home countries as well. This range of perspectives has become somewhat troublesome for those who defend a liberal theory of human rights and its universal integrity. Cultural relativism has a long history and many viewpoints, not all as radical as its critics suggest. The postmodern turn to this critique takes what has been called an "incredulity to metanarratives" which means a questioning of the "big theories" under which all smaller claims are organized. Thus, the word, rights in English may not correspond to its counterpart in another language; there may in fact be no counterpart. At the same time, these critics supports its norms. academic circles in the last five years. Much like the cultural relativists, feminists advocating for women's rights argue against the abstract notion of human (male) rights and call for a gendered human. It holds that certain norms are transcendent, and can become principles which guide the individual. ConclusionIf universalism has been abandoned for contingency by a majority of theorists in the west, then the west's position in the Asia West debate would benefit from this broader representation.
Common topics in this essay:
Bangkok Declaration,
Richard Rorty,
Carol Gilligan,
War II,
Jack Donnelly,
Kwan Yew,
West Asia,
John Locke,
Consider Cambodia,
Arjun Appadurai,
human rights,
natural law,
cultural relativism,
cultural relativists,
rights universal,
human rights universal,
bangkok declaration,
moral development,
jack donnelly,
international norm-setting,
rights cottage industry,
contemporary theory,
natural law tradition,
feminists communitarians postmodern,
human rights cottage,
|
Acceptance Essays
