SAT's Greatest Test: Social, Legal, and Demographic Forces
Article I. The SAT's Greatest Test: Social, legal, and demographic forces threaten to dethrone the most widely used college-entrance exam. SAT, a standardized testing used for college entrance exam have experienced a lot of turbulence and criticism for the past two decades. Critic's basic argument on the issue is that females and minority student are being discriminated by the employment of SAT unto college entry level. With these premises, the College Board had kept their ground on the issue by substantiating their claim that SAT is not by any means a biased test. Gaston Caperton, the College Board's president places emphasis on the unequal educational system as the real issue rather than blaming the problem unto the students and the test. However, many believe that the dilemma that SAT is now facing lies on the basic foundation of the system of testing. Debates are now mounting with regards to the present competence of SAT's system and questionnaires to accurately measure student's ability to grasp common knowledge. Critics of SAT also question the system as a basis for college admission and how it favors incoming college students. The president of the University of California system, Richard Atkinson, act
Uncertain on the true essence of the test results and ranking of states only aggregates to wrong decisions and polices being adapted and implemented by the federal government. Because of this, other public colleges have opted more on comprehensive review of college admission applications and essays rather than using test scores as basis. With the present rulings of colleges that are giving more preference to minority students because of SAT scores rather than subjectively reading admission applications have been legally questioned by white students. The aim of this proposed testing is to focus more on the knowledge gained by student in high school courses. This would then help colleges to measure and determine the intelligence of incoming students and predict their improvement in the whole college course. This law puts the true meaning of learning into containment by means of forcibly imposing governments expectation on test results from these standardized testing. Until there is a concrete alternative for SAT, this system of testing is still the best instrument to be used in the future of college education. In going against the policies of the No Child Left Behind Act, the goal and objective of NEA is to set straight governing laws that are viewed to be adverse to the interest of public education. The 10 percent policy guarantees admission for the top 10% student ranking during high-school. Recent surveys prove that the concentration of schools in these tests restrains students from getting into the proper way of learning and acquiring basic knowledge. In conclusion, the AYP does not by any means increase the accountability of schools. But again, this process is being undermined due its cost inefficiency. Last but not the least, as an alternative for SAT, Robert Sternberg propose on using psychomotor exams to gauge the creativity and practical skills of a student.
Common topics in this essay:
SAT Colleges,
Data Included,
Child Left,
Act Questioning,
College Board's,
Test Social,
Robert Sternberg,
NCLB Act,
Universities SAT,
Richard Atkinson,
sat scores,
alternative sat,
educational system,
standardized testing,
college admission,
nclb act,
basis college admission,
basis college,
system testing,
students test,
college board,
|
Acceptance Essays
