Implications of U.S. Foreign Policy in Iran
As the countries of the world line up into increasingly polarized political camps, the United States is facing a wide range of foreign policy issues that have assumed critical levels in recent weeks. Not only are countries in the Middle East openly defying U.S. hegemony in the region, countries in its own hemisphere such as Venezuela are arming themselves and proclaiming their opposition to American foreign policy as well. In the wake of September 11, 2001, many observers are suggesting that there is no longer any room for second guesses or false starts, and preemptive military action against international pariahs such as North Korea and Iran should be the order of the day. While the foreign policy hawks are beating these military drums, though, there are some vitally important considerations involved in this analysis that must be taken into account before formulating policy decisions, including the impact of Iran's current political leadership and policies on America's survival, security, stability and stature in the international community. To this end, this paper provides an analysis of the impact of the current situation in Iran on these U.S. national interests, followed by a discussion of recent events in Iran that have a
Call on all nations to temporarily suspend any further nuclear cooperation with Iran until the IAEA can clarify this matter and establish whether or not Iran has come into full compliance with the NPT; and, 4. Unfortunately, the current Iranian president has continued to thumb his nation's collective nose at the U. The stated intentions of Iran to develop nuclear reactor capabilities are a potential threat to the nation's very survival in the future. Conclusion The research showed that Iran represents one of the biggest threats to U. According to Afrasiabi (2006), "The international nuclear standoff with Iran, which is likely to culminate in United Nations sanctions given the present state of affairs, now has the distinct possibility of pushing Iran back to where it was in the early and mid-1980s, that is, international isolation. Economic sanctions are one of the most powerful weapons available in the United States' diplomatic arsenal; however, as noted above, in spite of continued economic hardships among many of the nation's populace, the country leadership is firmly embedded in power by virtue of enormous oil profits and important diplomatic relations with countries such as France and Russia that are already at philosophical odds with U. government analysts, the elections of a reformist president and religious leaders in the closing years of the 20th century, doomed the modest reform efforts that were underway at the time and Iran is now back in a virtual repressive stone age where it picks and chooses from a list of potential Western friends that no longer includes the United States. There may be a "New World Order" today, but it is still being sorted out.
Common topics in this essay:
Korea Iran,
Diplomatic Iranian,
Afghanistan Iraq,
Stature Iran,
Stability Iran,
Security Council,
France Russia,
Middle East,
North Korea,
Energy Technology,
united nations,
current situation,
foreign policy,
iran 2006,
economic sanctions,
afrasiabi 2006,
security council,
fundamentalist religious government,
influence region,
destabilizing influence,
current situation iran,
sokolski 2004,
remains highly destabilizing,
country remains highly,
highly destabilizing influence,
|
Acceptance Essays
