An Argument Against The War In Iraq
The recent war with Iraq has been on the minds of people all across the world since well before it started. Many are worried that the United States will be seen as being too controlling, and that it should let the Iraqi people work out their own problems. Others, who are concerned about the threat of terrorist activity in this country and others, stick with the belief that the United States was right in their attempt to remove Saddam Hussein from power. Regardless of which opinion one holds, there are theorists, both classical and modern, who have strong views on war. This is largely due to conflict theory, which is that life is largely characterized more by conflict that it is by consensus. Those who uphold this theory have different ways of looking at it, and the purpose of this paper is to look at classical theorists such as Karl Marx and Max Weber, as well as modern theorists such as Ralph Dahrendorf, and Lewis Coser. The different views they have of conflict theory will then be applied to the war in Iraq, to help show what they believe about conflict and why it is important. I will, however, refute many of their arguments because I am strongly against the war in Iraq and the pain and suffering that it is causing so man
Rather, they were interested in a lessening of the gap of social status between themselves and their government. Many of them are now more unhappy than they were when Saddam Hussein was in power, and this comes as a surprise to those that are over in that country, trying to save it from itself. Karl Marx is basically the father of conflict theory, and many of the conflict and other social theories around today came from his beliefs and opinions. This was especially true of work that resulted in the basic necessities such as shelter, clothing, and food. Unfortunately for the people of Iraq, it appears that Hussein's motives are not good ones. For example, the modern theorist Ralph Dahrendorf holds opinions very similar to Max Weber's. They were there for his personal needs, and the needs of the nameless, faceless mass of people did not make a difference to him. In addition, many of the Iraqi people are unhappy because the dreams and goals that they had when Hussein was removed from power have still not been realized. The Iraqi people, however, do not want the kind of 'saving' that the US and others have offered to them. However, the rest of the story is not as pretty. Max Weber also made a seemingly reasonable argument for why the war in Iraq is going on right now. They were just the working classes, and Hussein was determined that they would stay oppressed. Precious little has changed when it comes to whether the average Iraqi citizen is happy and has what he or she needs. Another modern-day theorist, Lewis Coser, seems to be a bit uncertain as to whether conflict is good or bad.
Common topics in this essay:
Saddam Hussein,
Saddam Hussein's,
Karl Marx,
Lewis Coser,
United Iraq,
Max Weber's,
Iraq United,
,
Max Weber,
iraqi people,
war iraq,
Ralph Dahrendorf,
conflict theory,
saddam hussein,
hussein power,
karl marx,
saddam hussein power,
max weber,
people iraq,
social status,
hussein removed,
marx max weber,
karl marx max,
country iraqi people,
hussein removed power,
|
Acceptance Essays
