Feedback Form

Get immediate access to thousands of

 high quality papers and essays.
Mega Essays Home  |   Questions?  |   Acceptable Use  |   Customer Care  |   Site Search
    Enter Essay Topic:

   

    Subjects:
Acceptance Essays
Arts
Custom Papers
English
Foreign
History
Miscellaneous
Movies
Music
Novels
People
Politics
Religion
Science
Sports
Technology

    Login:
Member Login
Join Now!
Click here to Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check
Click here to Join Now!
by: Phone 1-900

Federal Laws Protecting Employees in the Workplace

Introduction: There are a number of federal laws protecting employees in the workplace. Included in them are the Fair Labor Standards Act, the Equal Pay Act, the Occupational Health and Safety Act, and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. According to Dana Shilling in her book "Human Resources and the Law," the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) was passed to protect older workers who are still able to carry out vital job functions. Under the ADEA, employers with twenty or more employees are prohibited from discriminating against employees over forty years of age in hiring, compensation or other employment related areas including training, promotions or layoffs and terminations. The ADEA does not prohibit the discharge of employees over the age of forty for good cause or employee misconduct. The ADEA does prohibit employers for retaliating against older


Over the years, several other serious problems involving the CRA have been addressed through amendments. In any scenario in which retaliation by an employer is alleged, the burden of proving it can be difficult according to Shilling. For example, in 1991 the CRA was amended to allow for jury trials of employers accused of some form of employment related discrimination. Those who favored passing the Civil Rights Act (CRA) into law in the early 1960s were concerned about the manner in which Blacks and other minorities were treated in their search for housing, job and education for their children, and the way they were treated on the job. The compelling reason for this change is that the addition of punitive and compensatory damages gave more muscle to the Civil Rights Act - resulting in more employers taking this federal regulation more seriously. This amendment include provisions for punitive as well as for compensatory damages caused by the employer and suffered by the employee. Under the ADEA, the basis for termination must be a reasonable factor other than age. In the case of the ADEA, Shilling writes that a prima facia case for an ADEA lawsuit would be one in which the following criteria are met:The plaintiff or complainant is part of the protected group meaning he or she is over fortyThe plaintiff was qualified for the position that he or she held or was applying forThe plaintiff was discharged, not hired, demoted, not given a raise, or in some other way was discriminated against on the basis of age (Shilling, 1998)The Civil Rights ActIntroduction: According to Mike Deblieux in his book "Legal Issues for Managers," Title VII of the Civil Rights Act forbids employers from discriminating on the basis or age, race, religion, nationality or pregnancy status, and it covers employers with fifteen or more employees. Under Title VII, discrimination on the basis of religion is prohibited, and employers are required to make reasonable accommodations for an employee's religious practices and observances. It also resulted, in human resources professionals and senior managers becoming more diligent in observing the termination process in the workplace (Deblieux, 1997). The Act was amended in 1972 when it gave the Equal Employment Opportunity commission (EEOC) the right to file suit against employers. Minorities and women were routinely discriminated against in hiring, promotions, termination, discipline, work duties, training, and in determining whether or not they qualified for fringe benefits. workers that file complaints under the ADEA alleging that they are being discriminated against because of their membership in a protected class. Each federal law that protects workers has a different set of facts and factors used to determine if there is a prima facia case for a lawsuit.

Common topics in this essay:
Employment Act, Employment Opportunity, Rights Act, Act CRA, ADEA Shilling, Title VII, , civil rights act, civil rights, Civil Rights, rights act, Dana Shilling, Mike Deblieux, age discrimination employment, human resources, age discrimination, discrimination employment, adea prohibit, employment related, punitive compensatory, punitive compensatory damages, discrimination employment act, prima facia, compensatory damages,

See the rest of the paper. Join Now!

Approximate Word count = 596
Approximate Pages = 2 (250 words per page double spaced)

Already a member? Click here

More Essays on Federal Laws Protecting Employees in the Workplace


Student Papers:
debate 2000 5870 words
Workplace Violence 2491 words
Whistle Blowing 3358 words
To Be or Not to Be a Whistleblower 1112 words
Using Arrest Records in Hiring 2238 words

Professional Papers:
Labor Law622 words
Employee Termination3212 words
Sexual Harassment in the Workplace1836 words
Human Resources3318 words
ECommerce Law1868 words
Legal Questions Affecting Workers2235 words

Click here to Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check
Click here to Join Now!
by: Phone 1-900



CREDIT CARD
ONLINE CHECK
JOIN BY PHONE



Get immediate access to over 100,000
high quality term papers and essays!!!

Webmasters make $$$!



All papers are for research and references purposes only!
Copyright (c) 2001-2009 Mega Essays LLC
All rights reserved. DMCA HMS