Mexican Revolution
One of the reasons why the Mexican Revolution lasted far longer than either the American or French revolutions that preceded it was because there were so many different groups, led by so many varied, charismatic and influential leaders who each hailed from a different geographical area of Mexico, and who seemed to each have different goals and objectives for the future of the nation. These men included such well known characters as Pancho Villa, Francisco Indalecio Madero, General Victoriano Huerta, Emiliano Zapata and Pascual Orozco. Each of these men saw Mexico in their own light and with their own goals and objectives factored into Mexico's future. Some of these men could be classified as reformists, while others fall under the classification of revolutionaries. One such reformist was Francisco Madero. While imprisoned, he penned his thoughts and ideals in a document titled: The Plan of San Luis Potosi. This document was titled after the town where he was imprisoned by the President of Mexico in an attempt to discredit him and silence his voice for reform. The document was a plea to the citizens of Mexico to fight against the government. Concerning the citizens of Mexico, "He wrote, in their constant
In the summer of 1913 the two men joined forces to fight against the government. It took the two men approximately one year to force Huerta into exile, which took place in July 1914. Mexicans, he explained faced such a moment because tyranny oppresses us in such manner that it has become intolerable. Madero experienced difficulties from the very first moments of his presidency as evidenced by a manifesto issued by Emiliano Zapata approximately two weeks after Madero was sworn in as president. effort to obtain liberty and justice, find themselves forced in certain historic moments to make the greatest sacrifices. This event may have forced an 'evil man' out as the leader of the Mexican nation, but it did not solve many of the problems still facing the country. This could have been because there were so many revolutionaries attending the convention that an agreement between them would have been almost impossible. Out of the many documents from the early part of the Mexican Revolution, especially in regards to the documents discussed in this papers, it was most intriguing that the convention would choose this on to support, even if it was not wholeheartedly. An interesting note, however, was that the convention did vote to adopt Zapata's Plan de Ayala "in principle". " (Frost 1997 pg 47) The document was the establishing standard of the national constitutionalist movement and it also established Carranza as a reformist not a revolutionary. With these actions Huerta had achieved a life-long dream and quickly set about consolidating his power both through persuasion and through ruthless violence. At the same time Zapata was issuing his stand in the Plan de Ayala, another avowed revolutionary by the name of Pascual Orozco published his Plan Orozquista. The convention accomplished very little in constructive events, and other than declaring Carranza as a traitor because of his refusal to step down from the presidency, did not really set an agenda for the company. His army consisted of those poor citizens who where fed up with the policies of the government that could, and did, take their lands from them and gave them to the wealthy hacendados. Madero was then elected President, and began his efforts to change Mexico.
Common topics in this essay:
President Mexico,
Madero Frost,
Pancho Villa,
Emiliano Zapata,
Plan Guadalupe,
Huerta Diaz,
Plan Orozquista,
Orozco Zapata,
Mexican Revolution,
Victoriano Huerta,
fight government,
frost 1997,
plan de,
1997 pg,
de ayala,
frost 1997 pg,
plan de ayala,
goals objectives,
document titled,
willing lead army,
revolutionary name,
willing lead,
wealthy landowners,
document titled plan,
stated goals objectives,
|
Acceptance Essays
