Introduce, Discuss, and Analyze Archaeology Digs: Two Megiddo, Israel Web sites, including Comparison and Evaluation Each
The first site, http://www.tau.ac.il/humanities/archaeology/megiddo/index.html, presents a great deal of information in numerous pages. Just about every page has links to more information, from photos of the past projects to books, newsletters, and staff members' bios. It presents the information in an organized fashion, but some of it seems a bit condensed for the site, such as the history page, which is quite brief considering the age and importance of the dig site. Much of the other information presented is very detailed. This is a site geared to the serious student or fan of archaeology, rather than a casual visitor, and so, it includes far more information than the second site.The second site: http://www.bibleplaces.com/megiddo.htm, is a spiritually oriented site geared to visitors who may be traveling to the region. It presents basic information on Megiddo, including some of the major sites to see. It does not include nearly the amount of detail the first site includes, and it is a very basic look at the area. It is not meant to go into as much detail, or completely educate the Web visitor. The two sites have different purposes, and they have very different designs, as well. This Biblical site if far less sophisti
It is a nicely designed site, but a bit too bulky in some areas, so casual visitors might not stay long enough to get everything there is to get out of the site. I liked the comprehensive list of links at the end of this site that allowed the visitor to learn more, if they chose. They both provide good insight into the location; they just present it differently and are geared for very different types of Web site visitors. The first is an educational Web site whose goal is to educate the public about Megiddo and the study going on there. The second site is organized quite simply. At the educational site, Megiddo is the star, and the only reason the site exists, while at the spiritual site, Megiddo is just one of many sites to see, and many people may not find it in the crush of competing information on this site. There is scrolling "breaking news," the menu bar on the left moves as you move down the page, and there is fading in and out text about the 2008 dig season. It includes far more interesting photos on the main page, which may keep the visitor more interested and involved in the site. However, there is so much movement on the first page; it is distracting and a bit annoying. It may be good programming, but it is poor web design because it is too busy, it is distracting, and so much of it makes the site look amateurish rather than professional. The use of photos on the spiritual site helped make it more interesting and drew me in. It reaches its goal of teaching more about the site, but it could have been more effective with a different design and more photos. Thus, this site is geared to the casual visitor, while the education site was created for the serious student of archaeology. It would serve a tourist going to Israel or someone looking for very general information about Megiddo, such as the major sites to see in the Park. It was too many layers, and I think the average visitor would lose patience before they got to the actual photos.
Common topics in this essay:
,
Middle East,
educational site,
spiritual site,
site megiddo,
site geared,
information site site,
information educational site,
megiddo spiritual site,
educational site megiddo,
site site,
casual visitor,
serious student,
visit megiddo,
page visitor,
detailed information,
|
Acceptance Essays
